Whether a problem can be solved depends on two conditions: 1) there is an objective possibility of solving; 2. Have the right way to look at the problem. Among them, the objective possibility of solving the problem is the premise, but we usually use another term instead, that is, "hope". It is precisely because you know that there is hope for a solution to a certain problem, that you will work hard and strive for it, and if I say that you want you to find a way to make the sun never set, you will most likely not even bother to pay attention to me, because this is objectively impossible to achieve in the current earth environment. Therefore, there may be many reasons why a person can persevere after being in debt, but the fundamental reason is that the problem of debt is hopefully solved.
A problem has the hope of being solved, just to provide us with the most primitive motivation, from "wanting" to "getting", there is one more step, that is, "do", and the prerequisite for "doing" is that you can really "see clearly" and "think through" the problem, it depends on the thinking behind the problem. In other words, if the way of thinking about the problem is wrong, then hope can only stay in the theoretical possibility, and still cannot solve the problem.
There are three ways of thinking so far:
First, perceptual thinking, perceptual thinking is a kind of point thinking, which is engraved in human genes and is a mode of thinking, which is characterized by subjective judgment of events with intuitive emotions. You can recall whether when you decide to do something, you sometimes do it blindly just because someone else says a few things that seem to make sense, or you see someone else do something, or listen to someone say that a certain industry is very hot. Similarly, when solving the debt problem, you are often swayed by emotions, when things are approaching, you are so anxious that you scream, you can not sleep or even eat or drink, just hope that things can be solved, and secretly make up your mind to work hard in the future, but on weekdays you fall into a deep sense of powerlessness, unable to find the strength of the **, feel that everything is in vain. Obviously, this kind of thinking is the most undesirable, because it causes a person to make judgments about a matter with emotions and prejudices without knowing the whole picture;
Second, logical thinking, logical thinking is a kind of linear thinking, which refers to the use of causal logic for forward reasoning, obviously this way of thinking is more rational, just like the proof in mathematics, there is a reason to have a conclusion. Logical thinking can help us overcome emotional distractions, but only if you learn to apply logical thinking correctly. The biggest feature of logical thinking is positive reasoning, that is, the result can only be deduced if there is a cause first, but the reverse is not true, it cannot use the result to deduce the cause, just as under the normal rule there is a antecedent or condition of 5 plus 5, the result can be deduced must be 10, but the opposite is known that the result is 10, then the antecedent or condition cannot be deduced must be 5 plus 5, or it may be 2 plus 8 and so on. Unfortunately, a considerable number of debtors use logical thinking to deduce the cause, which is very wrong. What is odious is that there are many so-called "masters" or "experts" on the Internet who deliberately use the causal logic relationship in logical thinking to mislead debtors, and use nine truths and one false game to achieve their purpose of cheating traffic or promoting products, or even worse. Their methods are generally as follows: the first step is to find out the cause of the problem in order to solve the problem, that is, there must be a cause for the problem; The second step is to tell everyone that logical thinking is a kind of derivation thinking of causal logical relationships; In the third step, you can use logical thinking to deduce the cause with the effect. The first step and the second step are all right, but the third step is wrong, and the reason why this technique can be established is to take advantage of the fact that everyone is not unfamiliar with the term logical thinking but lacks a real understanding of the connotation of logical thinking, and its purpose is to make you believe that what they say is right, and really, such people are either stupid or bad. For example, many so-called "experts" or "experts" persuade debtors to reflect on their own shortcomings, because they want you to believe that your shortcomings have caused your current situation, and to change today's situation, you must start by changing your shortcomings. If you listen to these nonsense, there are only two results, you either feel that you are a useless person or you feel that you are a heinous person, without exception, because you will inevitably ignore the objective fact that no one is perfect, and you will also regard some instincts in human nature to seek advantages and avoid disadvantages under certain conditions as shortcomings, just as many people say that you are not successful because you are not hard enough, not self-disciplined enough, and also say: "The terrible thing is not that others are more successful than you, but that people who are more successful than you work harder than you." Whether a person can achieve achievements or not, hard work and self-discipline are only part of the reasons, in addition to at least other reasons such as the cooperation of the general environment, the availability of objective conditions, the blessing of luck, and the help of others. A person's success is the result of a combination of many factors, and only emphasizing hard work or self-discipline as the cause of failure will inevitably lead the debtor to fall into deep self-blame, and even seriously doubt himself and deny himself. In addition, there is also the reason for the debt is attributed to the lack of personality or ability or lack of cognition, you can think about it one by one, in short, remember that logical thinking is a positive deduction of thinking, its essence is the existence of a cause, and then deduce the result, that is, first know the cause and then know the effect, on the other hand, if you only know the result, the use of logical thinking can not deduce the cause, at least the deduced conclusion is not comprehensive.
3. Structural thinking, structural thinking is a holistic mode of thinking, which is the most advanced of the three types of thinking. It thinks about both the breadth and depth of the problem. Breadth is that it focuses not only on the relationship between the elements of the problem itself, but also on the relationships between other elements associated with the element. The so-called depth refers to the understanding of the history of a relationship, the inference of the conditions or circumstances that affect the relationship, and the influence of the future development trend of the relationship by preventing the emergence of conditions or situations. That is to say, we should look at the problem from the point of view of connection, find out the people or things that may be involved in the problem, and at the same time look at each relationship from the perspective of movement, summarize the conditions or situations that affect the development and change of the relationship, and on this basis, establish an overall view of solving the problem, plan out the steps and strategies to solve the problem, and set up a specific implementation plan with focus and taking into account other aspects for each step, and at the same time use a result to correct or improve the plan.
Originally, I wanted to give a real case, but most of the cases in reality are extremely complex, and all aspects need to be taken into account to give a solution, and it is difficult to make a choice between explaining thoroughly and not deviating from the topic.
Proficiency in structural thinking allows us to gain insight into all aspects of the problem from a global perspective, and to understand the relationship between the various people and things involved in the problem and the conditions that affect it, when you have a comprehensive and clear understanding of the problem, the idea of solving the problem will naturally arise, and then you only need to transform the idea into a specific plan, and constantly adjust the plan according to the new situation in practice, the problem will be resolved in the process of your growth. What we often call deep thinking, ability thinking, or cognitive thinking actually refers to the ability to analyze and solve problems, but it's just a different concept. So whether personal debt can be resolved, after you have mastered structural thinking, the answer is yes. In the words of the instructor, it is important for debtors to remember that the solution to a problem is not a result of hard thinking, but is naturally conceived by investigating all aspects of the problem and clarifying the various relationships of the problem.
In order to deepen your understanding of structural thinking, it is recommended that you read the two articles written by the faculty members, "Theory of Practice" and "Theory of Contradiction", and I believe that after reading them carefully, it will have a great trigger for you. At the same time, I would also like to remind you that structural thinking is a technical work, even if you know the theory, it does not mean that you understand, you still have to practice more, you can practice from what has happened around you, to practice deliberately, and keep practicing until you get used to it, which is the only way to master a new thinking. In the end, just using this article as a medium, I would like to say that the debtors have worked hard.
**10,000 Fans Incentive Plan