Recently, the well-known actor Liu Xiaoqing displayed his calligraphy works on the live broadcast platform, which aroused widespread attention and controversy. Liu Xiaoqing marked the price of 3999 yuan with the words "Purple Qi Donglai", which is obviously higher than ordinary calligraphy works.
Is this act the artist's self-amusement, or is it a blatant "cutting leeks" to fans? This article will examine this issue from multiple perspectives.
In evaluating this phenomenon, we should analyze and evaluate it from multiple perspectives.
First of all, as an old artist with both virtue and art, Liu Xiaoqing's achievements in the entertainment industry are undoubted. However, the identity of an artist does not equate to the artistic value of his calligraphic work. From the perspective of a professional calligrapher, although Liu Xiaoqing's characters have a certain foundation, they do not have high artistic value. Shu Jiong and other calligraphers criticized his characters as "too impetuous" and lacked the tempering of traditional inscriptions. If you compare her characters with those of the same level of calligraphers, they are obviously not worth it.
The crux of the matter lies in the rationality of the work. **When selling your own works, especially for the majority of fans, you need to be more cautious to avoid making fans feel like they are being "cut leeks".
Secondly, in-depth thinking about Liu Xiaoqing's motivation for selling words in live broadcast is also an important aspect of evaluating this behavior. If it is out of love and pursuit of art, then *** own works are understandable.
However, if it is a simple pursuit of economic interests, or even a suspicion of "cutting leeks", then it should be criticized. As a public figure, Liu Xiaoqing should be responsible for his actions and give back to fans and audiences with a good image and reputation.
This time, the market perspective is also a reference factor for evaluating the value of Liu Xiaoqing's calligraphy works. If the work is widely recognized and sought after by the market, then *** has a certain degree of rationality. However, if the work is not fully recognized by the market or is significantly higher than similar works, it is necessary to re-examine its reasonableness.
The public's reaction and attitude towards the incident cannot be ignored either. As a well-respected veteran artist, Liu Xiaoqing's impact on fans and audiences cannot be ignored. **Will calligraphy affect the good image she creates? Will it lead to fan disgust and alienation? These are all questions that deserve in-depth consideration.
Again, Liu Xiaoqing's choice of live broadcast to sell words is understandable. In today's era of rapid development of the e-commerce economy, many celebrities have devoted themselves to live streaming and using their influence to monetize.
However, the point is that what she sells is not an ordinary commodity, but calligraphy works with an artistic nature. This brings us to the boundary between art and commerce. Art should be pure, not coerced by money. Even if it is a star calligrapher, his work should be within a reasonable range, and should not be pursued excessively.
Moreover, the reason why Liu Xiaoqing's calligraphy works** have caused controversy is also because of its target audience - fans. Fans are often willing to pay for idols' products out of their love and support. However, this does not mean that they are not judged. Fans should look at their idols' works rationally and should not be carried away by emotions. If you blindly buy a certain star's ** works just because you like them, this is undoubtedly a blasphemy against art.
Finally, as a public figure, Liu Xiaoqing's behavior undoubtedly has an exemplary effect. Her every move has an impact on society. Therefore, while pursuing economic benefits, she should also assume certain social responsibilities. She should lead by example and guide fans to look at the relationship between art and business rationally, instead of using fans' feelings to blindly pursue **.
To sum up, for Liu Xiaoqing's live broadcast of selling words, we can't simply label it as "entertaining ourselves" or "cutting leeks".
Rather, in-depth analysis and evaluation should be carried out from multiple perspectives. As an artist and public figure, Liu Xiaoqing should take responsibility for his actions and give back to fans and audiences with a good image and reputation.
At the same time, we also hope that the majority of fans can look at this incident rationally and not be swayed by blindly following trends and hype.
In addition, we need to think more deeply about this phenomenon. In today's society, with the development of Internet technology and the upgrading of consumption patterns, more and more artists have begun to set foot in the commercial field. This not only provides artists with more creative space and financial support, but also brings new challenges and games between business and art.
How to balance the relationship between art and commerce, not only to maintain the artist's creative independence and good image, but also to achieve a win-win situation of economic and social benefits, has become an important topic.
In this context, we call on artists to adhere to the bottom line and moral code of art, and maintain a sense of awe for art and a sincere attitude towards fans while pursuing artistic innovation and commercial success.
At the same time, all sectors of society should also strengthen the supervision and guidance of artists' behavior, and promote the benign interaction and development of art and commerce. Through joint efforts, we believe that we can create a healthier and more harmonious art market environment, so that art can truly serve the people and contribute to social progress.