The United States** was widely alarmed by the delay in reporting, and their actions appeared ridiculous. According to reports, in the middle and late last month, the US Customs seized thousands of Volkswagen-branded vehicles, including Porsche, Bentley and Audi, on the grounds that "parts are suspected of violating sanctions against China", a move that has had a big impact on the European auto industry. So, what is the basis for this move by the United States? It is said that the United States relied on the ban on Xinjiang-related products two years ago and the sanctions imposed on China's Huawei and other semiconductor and related industries three years ago. The U.S. alleges that "Xinjiang-related products" may involve "forced labor," while China's Huawei technology and products are seen as a threat to the U.S. U.S. Customs claimed that the seized vehicles included parts from Xinjiang and chips jointly developed with China's Huawei. On these absurd grounds, the United States seized the vehicles. Unless Germany can provide proof of traceability of all parts of these vehicles, proving that they have nothing to do with Xinjiang and Huawei, the products will be seized and fined. It is clear that the German vehicles have fallen into the trap of the United States.
It has been argued that this is nothing more than the act of the United States Federal**, which is on the verge of bankruptcy and relies on the temporary appropriations bill to operate temporarily, and is in fact tantamount to using domestic law for international robbery. But I think there may be a deeper purpose behind this. The United States** can not only make profits by auctioning off the impounded vehicles, but also increase revenue through fines, and by forcing German Volkswagen to provide parts traceability materials to grasp the layout and production capacity of China's and Germany's auto parts industry, and infer the intelligence of other related industries. Such a move could also deter other countries and force them to join the US sanctions camp against China. The larger purpose of the United States may lie in three aspects: first, in the name of "safeguarding human rights", it will contain Xinjiang's development and China's economy, and create factors of instability in China; Second, under the condition that China's auto industry has jumped to the first place in the world, it will curb China's auto parts industry and weaken the development momentum of China's auto industry; The third is to crack down on German automobile exports to China and the joint development of automobile technology, so as to create conditions for American automobiles to seize market share.
At present, the United States has adopted the model of "poor donkey skills" in containing China's development and has entered a state of hysteria. This performance has brought a major warning sign to world security. Faced with an unfavorable electoral situation, the United States may take more radical measures and even provoke a world war in an attempt to divert domestic contradictions and resolve the crisis of the collapse of the United States. German car companies expressed strong incomprehension and anger at this, but in vain, Scholz directly ignored it. Scholz is also nothing more than an executor of US policy in Germany. The U.S. team has been stationed in Germany since World War II and secretly exercises control over Germany. Germany** has no say in this regard. Behind this move by the United States is also based on anxiety. The rise of China's auto manufacturing industry has made the United States uneasy and panicked. China has become the world's largest automotive market and industrial country, and has made amazing progress in new energy vehicles, smart cars, autonomous driving and other fields. Can the United States stop China's rise? If the United States continues to obstruct China's development, the end result may be that China will be victorious.
The actions of the United States are not only a kind of suppression of Germany, but also a provocation against China. In this way, the United States is trying to defend its interests and try to prevent the rise of China. This practice is not only unjust, but also violates the rules and spirit of international law. The United States should realize that unilateral measures will not only not solve the problem, but will also cause more distress and loss to itself and others. On the contrary, differences should be resolved through dialogue and cooperation to achieve a win-win situation. Only in this way can we achieve peace and prosperity in the world.
The above content information is ** on the Internet, if there is any infringement and other issues, please contact the author!