From a certain point of view, nuclear **, and the corresponding nuclear ** delivery capability, is a country's best defense**.
It can be seen from the Russian-Ukrainian war that nuclear ** is the best means of defense.
In February, the dynamic incentive plan If Russia does not have nuclear weapons, NATO will definitely not say a word, first set up a no-fly zone over Ukraine, and then the no-fly zone will soon be extended to Russian airspace.
And then it won't be long before a "multinational force" will appear on the ground to help the Ukrainian people regain lost ground.
Finally, there is the "punitive action", which will drag Putin to trial, and then throw the ashes into the Black Sea, Moscow will be replaced by the ** supported by the Americans, and the Russian oil and gas companies happen to be state-owned, and the democratic freedom of the Americans will definitely support the acquisition of domestic companies.
Why didn't any of this happen? Is the Russian army strong?
No, it's Russia that really has nuclear **.
Even if Ukraine wins, wins big, wins, wins and wins, it only dares to win on its own soil, so that as long as Zelensky is ready to lead troops to Moscow, NATO will make this democracy fighter ** dare not bear that risk without saying a word.
Russia's nuclear ** is to ensure that Ukraine can only win on its own soil.
That is, to ensure that you will not lose on your own soil.
The theory of the use of nuclear **, there is a word, called nuclear deterrence.
What is Nuclear Deterrence? It is to ensure mutual destruction.
The key to ensuring mutual destruction is the ability to destroy each other in any situation, and to let each other know about it.
Strategic nuclear ** is never used to fight the opponent's army, nor is it used for attack, but for retaliation, to destroy the opponent's cities, kill the opponent's citizens, and destroy the opponent's industrial system and economic base.
This is similar to the law, which does not directly prevent you from committing crimes, but deters you from committing crimes by puniting you after committing them.
The role of nuclear ** is better than that of law, because there is still some luck in the face of law, and for nuclear deterrence, there will be no luck in national politics.
Therefore, since World War II, there has been basically no large-scale war between the nuclear powers.
Of course, it is still necessary to emphasize that real nuclear deterrence is not only nuclear ***, but also needs to have the corresponding delivery capability and counterattack capability.
Why did we engage in "two bombs and one satellite" back then? The two bombs here, the nuclear bomb and the missile, are themselves nuclear ** and the ability to deliver, so what is a star? It is the ability to detect attacks, that is, the ability to counterattack in time.
Only a perfect two bombs and one satellite can have a complete nuclear deterrent capability.
On nuclear deterrence, you can refer to another article.