The escalation of the internal conflict in the United States: the detonation of ethnic disputes.
In recent years, the situation in the United States has become increasingly serious, and this is no longer just a sharp confrontation between the two main parties, but a systemic contradiction from top to bottom. Nowhere is this more evident than in an election year, when social problems are often exaggerated, leading to military clashes at both state and federal levels. In these incidents, the national question was used as the fuse, triggering even greater conflicts.
In the last elections,"Black Lives Matter"It has occurred in the United States for a long time, causing a period of unrest in law and order. This time, the most heart-wrenching thing is the border. Against this background, the national question has gradually risen to a new height. Although the two parties in the United States once agreed on the issue of population mobility, due to the continuous influx of foreign population, the local people have become concerned about their rights and job prospects, which has led to disagreements and eventually evolved into higher-level conflicts. As a result, the various conflicts that started from the bottom have become various problems from the top down, causing the United States to become more and more divided, more intense, and more difficult to deal with.
In this case, a member of the United States Congress proposed a nationwide divorce issue. She demanded that the United States be divided into two: red states and blue states. Red states represent what Republicans are doing well, and blue states represent dissenting opinions. The central idea of the plan is that in order to prevent further conflicts, electors from both parties can manage their own constituencies separately. However, such a call is more like a kind of grumbling and ridicule of the current situation, which cannot be realized. Just as it is not easy to break up a family, divorce, let alone a nation. But the nationwide divorce also highlights the dangers of the Civil War facing the United States, which gives people the opportunity to take advantage of"Divorce"ways to deal with this.
The danger of the Civil War intensified: the problem was far from over.
The current situation is just beginning, and it is not over yet. The initial armed confrontation was only the beginning of such a confrontation, and there may be even greater turmoil in the future. In fact, the controversy is simply about winning votes in the election. Republicans are trying to prove that they are fighting illegal immigration, while Democrats are sticking to overt immigration policies to attract new immigrants. Now, relations in Texas have become very tense, one might even say sabre-rattling, and the situation is at a stalemate. Both parties are looking forward to the High Court's verdict in the hope of a final verdict that will bring the dispute to an end. But when one of the sides can't legally win the war and can't end it by starting a civil war, they will look for other ways to compensate for their losses. Such a feud will reign supreme in an election year.
American politicians will not allow the United States to be divided in two, and this is for their own reasons. However, the escalating domestic contradictions in the United States have put the United States in a difficult situation. As the saying goes, "No matter how strong a castle is, it is often broken from the inside out." "The number one enemy of the United States is itself, and its growing internal conflicts pose a great threat to the future of the United States.
The conclusion is that the rift in the United States is widening, and the national question is the trigger for the growing conflict. The problem of the flow of foreign population in the United States is particularly serious, and the people's fear and resistance to the inflow of foreign population has gradually escalated to the confrontation at the top, causing social conflicts at the grassroots level to gradually escalate into problems from the grassroots level to the higher level. In this context, U.S. legislators have submitted a nationwide marriage plan to divide the United States into "red states" and "blue states." However, such a cry can only be a kind of grumbling and ridicule of the current situation, and cannot be realized. The current situation is just beginning, and there may be even bigger problems waiting for us in the future. Both parties will compete for votes in elections, and disputes between the two parties will increase the danger of civil war in the United States. While divorce is not the best option, nationwide divorce also puts the United States in danger of war. The United States has caused domestic turmoil in the United States, and the strongest castles are often broken from the inside out. All this reminds us that independence and harmonious coexistence are the foundation of a nation, and fragmentation can only make the nation more fragile.