I have to say that Macron is a master and it is easy to make big news in the world. Anyway, Europe and the United States feel that they are being led, and they need to discuss their proposal: Western countries should immediately send troops to Ukraine. Please note that we are no longer providing assistance in terms of aircraft, artillery, missiles, but immediately sending troops to help Ukraine fight and meet Russia on the battlefield. When you go to war, you die. Is the West really willing? One way or another, Biden shook his head in horror. The White House immediately clarified that the United States would not send troops, and the United States would not allow NATO to send troops. Scholz's attitude is clearer. Germany will not send troops. Germany must prevent the escalation of the war. "There will be no German soldiers ...... Ukrainian soilOur country and its military structures will not participate in this war. "After reading it, in addition to the United States and Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, the Czech Republic, etc., as well as Sweden, which wants to join NATO, are also opposed. The Slovak minister was even more scared and said: he really could not imagine that NATO soldiers would appear on Ukrainian soil. At the conference on aid to Ukraine in Paris on February 26, Macron said: The West must use all means to prevent Russia from winning the war. Therefore, due to the change in the situation, there are no controllable options, including direct dispatch of troops. He also defended himself by saying that the same people who still say "no" now also said two years ago that "we will not provide tanks or planes"; Two years ago, there were people at this table. bags and helmets, but now, there is a discussion about how to provide this military assistance faster and more.
Is it enough? This means that Western aid is cutting sausages, step by step, and Russia is powerless. But Macron's remark is clearly referring to the person who frightens the Huai. He laughed at Scholz. Didn't it be said before that Germany only supplied sleeping bags and helmets, but also Panther tanks? It's hilarious that you guys also refuse the Taurus missile! I always feel that Macron is playing a big trick when he says that he wants to send troops to Ukraine. 1。Cheers for Ukraine. As a result of the recent losing streak on the battlefield, the morale of the Ukrainian army has been severely hit. At the critical moment, Macron cheered and directly said that we should be ready to send troops. Although I know it's a painted cake, it's a great gift for Ukraine today. 2. Issuing a restraining order against Putin. Don't think we don't dare to meet in battle. If we do send troops, can you send troops for Russia? According to Western analysis, Macron intends to "send a deterrent signal to Putin" through this public statement. It will also be a bargaining chip for France in the future. 3. Also put pressure on the United States. The United States is the largest foreign aid to Ukraine, but domestic political struggles in the United States have delayed the implementation of American aid. Macron is also putting pressure on the United States. If you don't pay as soon as possible, we'll go straight to the battlefield. If something goes wrong, you will be the one responsible for solving it. The final foothold is this sentence: the United States cannot be trusted, and Europe cannot trust the American ......4. This is more challenging for Germany. In any case, since Merkel's retirement, Franco-German relations have been in trouble. Therefore, judging by Macron's speech in Paris, many of them are directed at Scholz. Germany should stop being stingy and pay for Taurus tanks and missiles. 5. Demonstrate French leadership. I don't know when the troops will be sent, but one sentence can move the entire West**. I have to say that Macron really has a way.
Of course, it may cover two issues. One of the problems is the contradictions in France. There are so many contradictions, which makes Macron a headache, otherwise he would not have changed the prime minister like this. Through this form of diplomacy, everyone's attention will be diverted, and the pressure on domestic affairs will be greatly reduced. Another problem is the very little assistance that France has provided to Ukraine. Judging by Western aid data, the United States is the largest recipient of military aid, and the European Union is the largest spender of military aid. Specifically, as far as European countries are concerned, Germany remains the biggest beneficiary, but what about France? France lags far behind Germany, Great Britain, Denmark, Norway, Poland, the Netherlands, Belgium and other countries. That is, France actually donates a lot of money (maybe part of it is from the EU, but Germany definitely has more) and does not offer a lot **, but Macron has the ability to make Ukraine thank you. France is more reliable; It also made the whole world think that France has done a lot, definitely more than Germany, and has sent troops to help Ukraine. This ability! Are we going to send troops? That is, France will send troops? I can't say, I want to keep the strategy vague, Macron said. But France was in trouble. Le Pen, the leader of the far-right National Line, criticized Macron for not caring about the lives of the people; Mélenchon, the leader of the French far-left party, thinks Macron is crazy. Looking at Moscow, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov also said that if NATO does send troops, "in this case, it is not the possibility (of direct conflict) that should be discussed, but its inevitability." There is also Russia** that if this happens, it can be seen as NATO's declaration of war on Russia. Russians are not good people, the whole world knows it. If it is really forced, not Ukraine, but all of Europe. From this point of view, Scholz was very clear and determined not to send troops. As for the Taurus missile, it is an offensive missile with a range of more than 500 km**. The Ukrainian army can attack Moscow immediately. Therefore, we absolutely cannot provide it. Germany is the biggest victim of the conflict in Ukraine. However, the more sober Germany is and the more principled it is, the more it will give the United States and France a chance to solve the problem.
So, Macron must not be crazy. France will not be the first country to send troops to kill him. Governance is not all a matter of rationality. Macron likes to be unconventional. He only raised the question of sending troops, and he managed to become the protagonist of the West. You have to admire this ability to manipulate the international **. Biden must have been so moved that he laughed himself; Scholz is more shy, Macron, you are shy. You know, in order to help Ukraine, Germany spent the most money in Europe, donated the most ** in Europe, and even sacrificed its own Nord Stream pipelines, and even sacrificed its own GDP growth, but it was still pursued by Ukraine, accused of being stingy, and never wanted to be ridiculed by Macron. When Macron pointed to the mulberry tree and shook the locust tree, Scholz sat next to Macron, his face red and white. In this world, people who can do things are not as good as people who can talk, and people who can talk are not as good as people who can do things. Germany was slapped in the face by Macron!