Top Writers
Preface. Recently, there was another nuclear power plant leak in Japan, and the Japanese authorities wanted to end the storm with "great regret", but China refused. Wang Wenbin, spokesman for China's press conference, made a solemn request to Japan: You must make a serious and serious response to international concerns.
At the same time, Mr. Wang repeated China's plea: Japan should work with its neighbors to develop a test protocol in which all of our neighbors participate. How much impact and danger will Japan's nuclear radiation be caused?
Leakage at a wastewater treatment plant in Japan.
The wastewater discharged from Japan's Fukushima nuclear power plant has attracted great attention from all over the world. After Japan** discharged radioactive wastewater into the sea in August next year, it was strongly opposed by many countries and regions, including China.
Japan** has always claimed that it uses high-tech means to remove all harmful components except tritium, and the concentration of tritium is within the range of international regulations, so it can be safely discharged into the ocean.
Recently, however, another "thunderbolt" broke out in Japan, causing shocks and questions around the world. Japan ** reported that in Japan's Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant, workers found that the air extraction line on the wall was leaking outside a factory building where nuclear wastewater was temporarily stored on February 7.
According to inspections, the concentration of radioactivity here is more than 240 times higher than that of the surrounding area, and the plant is still treating the radioactive wastewater inside the nuclear power plant, but 10 of the 16 valves that should have been closed are open.
This means that a significant amount of unprocessed nuclear wastewater is leaked to the outside world.
The accident revealed significant regulatory deficiencies in Japan's disposal of wastewater from nuclear power plants, as well as errors in human behavior.
The Japanese news also criticized this incident as an extremely absurd incident, showing how irresponsible and unprofessional Japan is in the disposal of nuclear wastewater. At the same time, Japan's strength in nuclear emissions, as well as its credibility, have been strongly questioned by countries around the world.
Can Japan truly achieve the disposal and discharge of nuclear wastewater in accordance with international standards and guidelines, and disclose relevant information in a timely and transparent manner, so as to effectively protect the marine ecology and public health of neighboring countries and regions?
Japan is working on public relations.
In the face of this major disaster, both Japan and TEPCO are trying to use public relations to ease complaints and doubts at home and abroad. First, they expressed "great regret" for the attack and apologized to the affected people and fishermen.
However, the Japanese apology was clearly unconvincing, neither taking responsibility for their own faults nor giving any suggestions for compensation or improvement, but vaguely saying "regret".
Next, they also proposed to carry out a comprehensive investigation of equipment, management and other aspects to avoid the recurrence of similar incidents, and at the same time to increase supervision of the disposal of wastewater from nuclear power plants. However, such a statement does not dispel doubts.
These documents do not spell out neither the time frame, scope and results of the investigations, nor the standards, methods and frequency of monitoring and testing, nor the manner in which relevant information and information are made available and shared with the international community, and how they are monitored and evaluated by the international community.
In conclusion, they said that more information would be released in the future and that they would maintain contact and collaboration with countries around the world to clarify misconceptions and concerns about nuclear power plant wastewater. However, such a statement is not convincing.
Because they have not made it clear whether they will reconsider the issue of nuclear wastewater, whether they will listen to and respect international views and proposals, whether they will carry out effective exchanges and cooperation with surrounding countries and regions, and whether they will respect and abide by some international laws and conventions.
China has responded.
Of course, China will not accept such a crisis public relations as Japan, let alone be fooled. China's spokesman Wang Wenbin issued a solemn statement on 8 February on Japan: You must make a serious and serious response to international concerns.
At the same time, Mr. Wang repeated China's plea: Japan should work with its neighbors to develop a test protocol in which all of our neighbors participate.
Wang Wenbin said that Japan's discharge of pollutants is a major event related to global public safety and the interests and obligations of all countries in the world.
China calls on Japan to fully listen to and attach importance to the views and voices of the international community, especially neighboring countries and regions, and on this basis, strengthen supervision and evaluation of the Japanese side, so as to ensure the ecological security and public health security of China's maritime areas and ensure international justice and justice.
The impact and danger of Japan's discharge of pollutants is not limited to Japan, but also involves neighboring countries and regions, and has become a global problem that must be paid attention to and resolved by all countries in the world.
The discharge of radioactive wastewater will bring huge damage and pollution to the marine environment, and also bring huge risks to people's health and safety.
The radiation contained in nuclear wastewater will not be diluted by seawater, but will spread more widely with the movement and propagation of the sea.
Conclusion. The harm and harm of nuclear wastewater is not only a major issue that transcends national borders, time and space, but also has a bearing on the survival and development of the whole world, and it is also a major issue that requires the joint participation of the international community.