The Mercedes-Benz Gassel incident has now taken a big turn, why has the 10-day administrative detention of the Mercedes-Benz Gassel driver not been revoked?
Some people may wonder, isn't the Mercedes-Benz gasket incident a sure fact? Why is there still a reversal?
Let's take a look at how many things have been reversed;
Reversal 1: The Mercedes-Benz of the Mercedes-Benz plugged incident was not maliciously plugged.
After the related ** fermented on the Internet, many people were indignant at that time and felt that the owner of the Mercedes-Benz car was maliciously plugged, and finally became angry and angry, which led to the appearance of such a **.
That's not the case.
First of all, the Mercedes Benz entered the ferry alternately, and there was no malicious jamming.
Moreover, the Mercedes-Benz was supposed to be in front of the white car, and it was the white car that did not give way in the process of alternating traffic that led to the situation behind.
Reversal 2: The Mercedes-Benz Gasai incident is not a grandmother driving.
At the beginning of the Mercedes-Benz gasser incident, in fact, the people who posted *** on the Internet had a default meaning that the grandmother was driving.
is also because of the acquiescence, coupled with the fact that *** people moved the grandmother out to shoot**, in the end, not only caused many netizens on the Internet to think that the grandmother drove the car, but even our central media directly said that it was the car driven by the 71-year-old Grandma Xu when it was published publicly.
The 71-year-old grandmother drives, which has led many people to choose sympathy.
In addition, the owner of the Mercedes-Benz car in ** is indeed scolding, and it is indeed angry and smashing the car.
However, the reality is also reversed.
The reality is this: the owner of the Mercedes-Benz and the white car only alternately passed, and there was no malicious plugging, and more importantly, the driver of the white car at that time was not 71-year-old Grandma Xu.
Reversal three: Mercedes-Benz owners are not as bad as everyone thinks.
At the beginning of the related ***, many people on the Internet felt that Mercedes-Benz owners were very bad.
The reason why I feel that the owner of the Mercedes-Benz is very bad is because in everyone's subjective consciousness: the owner of the Mercedes-Benz is a person who violates traffic rules, and he scolds and smashes the car angrily.
However, the fact is that the white car *** person is not only the first time to use this way to *** others to stuff themselves, there has been such a situation long before.
It's just that the *** didn't ferment so much before, and this time it also made people see the unique behavior of the white car *** people again.
Now it is certain that the owner of the Mercedes Benz was indeed administratively detained for 10 days, and it was indeed scolding and smashing the white car.
But in fact, he is not as bad as everyone imagined, and the driver in the car that caused this ** storm also has a certain responsibility.
Seeing this, many people will still wonder, since there have been various reversals in the matter of Mercedes-Benz car stoppering, why has the administrative detention of Mercedes-Benz owners not been revoked?
The reason why the owner of the Mercedes-Benz car has not been revoked from administrative detention and has not been revoked from the administrative fine is that it involves legal issues, not whether it is reversed or not.
So let's popularize the relevant legal issues for you.
The first thing to understand is the legal issue of violating traffic rules.
China's road traffic safety law clearly stipulates that anyone who violates traffic rules is a violation.
Of course, the penalties for traffic rule violations are quite different from those for other violations.
Normally, if it is not a particularly serious traffic violation, if it is not a traffic violation that causes particularly serious consequences, it will not be subject to administrative detention, let alone criminal detention.
It can be seen from the report that the behavior of the owner of the Mercedes-Benz is not a traffic violation, but a dispute caused by the order of traffic.
This can clearly see that the owner of the Mercedes-Benz is not subject to administrative detention and administrative punishment for violating traffic rules.
In fact, what we need to understand is: what kind of law does the owner of the Mercedes-Benz car violate before he will be administratively punished.
From what everyone has learned, it has been clearly seen that Mercedes-Benz owners do have relevant illegal acts.
Verbally abusive is a legal offense.
Insult: refers to the use of violence or other methods to publicly degrade the personality of another person or damage the reputation of another person, and the circumstances are serious. According to article 246 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, the penalty for the crime of insult may be up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention, controlled release or deprivation of political rights.
Angry smashing of someone's car also involves the illegal act of deliberately destroying someone's property.
Although the owner of the Mercedes-Benz was annoyed and angry because of the traffic sequence, he did not control his emotions and did smash the white car out of a hole.
If the white car violates the law in the process of transportation, then you can complain to the relevant departments, so that the relevant departments can use legal means to punish them.
However, the owner of the Mercedes-Benz smashed a hole in other people's vehicles, which is obviously an illegal act.
The owner of the Mercedes-Benz smashed another person's car and fell into a pit, which is a public security case from the analysis of China's law.
According to the analysis of China's relevant laws: if the intentional damage to other people's property does not constitute a criminal offense, it is a public security case, and the person shall be detained for not less than 5 days but not more than 10 days, and may also be fined up to 500 yuan; where the circumstances are more serious, they are to be detained for between 10 and 15 days, and may be concurrently fined up to 1,000 RMB.
After understanding these legal knowledge, I believe everyone has seen very clearly why there are various reversals on the Internet, and the administrative punishment will not be revoked.
The reason is very simple, the Mercedes-Benz owner did violate the relevant laws and regulations, and the administrative punishment is very applicable to him.
As for how the white car uses ** to take advantage of other people's sympathy, this has nothing to do with the Mercedes Benz owner being punished.
Through this incident is also to tell us all:
Eating melons on the Internet, don't think that person is a bad person because of a one-sided situation, there will be a lot of reversals.
At the same time, it is also to tell everyone that you must not touch the law, because once you break the law, no matter how serious the circumstances are, you will have to pay the corresponding price.
Welcome to like and click, I am your legal assistant, sharing relevant legal knowledge and analyzing relevant legal cases every day.