The whistleblowing team led by Beijing lawyer Jin Lei pointed out that the proportion of plagiarized words in the second and third parts of Mr. Liu** was as high as 867% and 947%, and the plagiarism rate of the whole article reached an astonishing 639% 。This figure is far beyond what is acceptable to the academic community and far beyond the limits of normal citations and citations. Such a plagiarism ratio makes people question, the bottom line of Liu's academic ethics is **?
Academic plagiarism not only damages an individual's reputation but also desecrates the entire academic system. The Vice-President of the Court shall be the guardian of legal justice and professional ethics. But if she can't even guarantee the originality and authenticity of her academic **, how can she make others believe in her judgments and decisions in the judicial field? Public doubts about the credibility of the judiciary are not unfounded.
This matter is not just Liu's problem. This reflects possible regulatory loopholes and deficiencies in the academic evaluation system throughout the judicial system. If the vice president of the court could be promoted for plagiarism**, would others follow suit? This potential malpractice, if left uncorrected, will cause long-term damage to the administration of justice.
In the face of such accusations, Liu Moumou and his court need to give a clear attitude and handling results. Academic misconduct should not be an excuse for anyone to evade responsibility, let alone a ladder for judicial promotion. What the public expects is an honest, fair and just judicial environment, which requires the cultivation and self-discipline of every judicial worker.