It's coming, it's coming: Reuters, China's air pollution is decreasing, too clean has led to an increase in temperature, and India can't learn!
Reuters said that the so-called six leading Western climate experts said that the results of China's decade-long and efficient "pollution war" showed that China's average temperature has risen by 0.0 since 2014, thanks to the removal of toxic barriers from pollutants that scatter and reflect solar radiation7 degrees Celsius, triggering an even more intense heat wave. In response, Western scientists say that the elimination of air pollution over the past decade — what scientists call "unveiling" — could have had a greater impact on temperatures in some of China's industrial cities than greenhouse gases themselves.
Experts warn that if other highly polluted parts of the world, such as India and the Middle East, follow China's lead and clean the sky of sulphur dioxide and the polluting aerosols it forms, a similar jump in global warming will occur.
You look at these rotten goods, China's pollution control has led to the rise in temperature, and in their eyes, China is not doing anything right, which is secretly poking and prodding the rhythm China is responsible for the global temperature rise [spit].
In fact, European and American gangs, especially Anglo-Saxon gangs, often slap themselves in the face. In the last century, China's desertification was serious, and they said that China's disorderly development led to desertification.
In this century, China's people have retreated from the desert, and greening has become the best in the world, contributing half of the world's new forest area. As a result, Europe and the United States say that China's desertification control is a natural state that destroys the ecology.
China used to eat less meat, and they despised China's insufficient protein intake, which was the root cause of children's lack of growth. When China can eat meat and drink milk, they say that China will eat a piece of beef and start a fire in the Amazon rainforest, which means that because China buys soybeans from Brazil, Brazil will burn the forest. However, they have never reflected that the per capita meat consumption in Europe and the United States is much higher than that in China, and although China's eating habits can be milked and meat, the combination of meat and vegetables is much stronger than theirs.
So, some people say that we want to be friendly with Europe and the United States, when did we say that we would not be friendly with Europe and the United States? The problem is that they don't see us doing well, and think that if we live well, they are squeezing out their living space. In his speech in Australia, Obama said that if China needed four earths to live on the level of developed countries, Western life would not be sustainable.
You drive well and don't hit people, but someone is going to hit you, what can you do? Now the Americans are the ones who rush at you as you walk. And the Americans also said by *** that it was you who hit them.
With the development of China's information industry, Americans used to say that the information industry is the light of mankind, and it is necessary to be exempt from taxes and to promote digital equality for human beings. Now that China is beyond them, information products are a security threat.
Similar to green and low-carbon industries, if the UK can't do it in China, it will say that it can't meet the earth's environmental protection at the expense of the lives of the British. Why didn't they say that to developing countries before?
Therefore, seeing all kinds of double standards without a bottom line in Europe and the United States, everyone has become accustomed to nature, getting into their ring, and beating them down, and letting them be clowns off the stage, this is our best logic.