The US imperialists vetoed it, what should we do?

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-02-26

The US imperialists vetoed it, what should we do? 」

Oops, what's wrong with this world? The US imperialists vetoed it with one vote, and it was really hot to watch! It's really a bit confusing, the ceasefire resolution proposed by China at the United Nations was rejected by the US imperialists, which is simply infuriating.

You say, the United Nations is the United Nations, an institution for world peace, but it was rejected by a country in this way. Doesn't it make the situation on the other side of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict even more chaotic, and does it not clearly ignore the innocent people who are in the midst of the war?

If nothing else, let's just say that the Rafah area has already gathered millions of Palestinian refugees. The US veto is simply encouraging Israel's aggression. I watched the news about the crimes committed by the Israeli army against the Palestinian people, and it was shocking. Isn't this some *** sin, race ***? Didn't the civilization of the world society regress to the period of World War II because of this aggression?

You see, the Jews were victims of the Nazis back then, but how can they impose their suffering on the Palestinian people today? It's ironic!

Well, but then again, all of this isn't unexpected. You think, Israel is the "father" of the United States, and the family does not speak two words. Both of them have the same basic interests in the Middle East, and they both want to eliminate the forces that resist them in the Middle East in order to control the entire Middle East. It's just that this time it's the "father" who started it, and the United States, a "filial and good boy", is providing the best equipment behind the scenes, but it is still staging a farce at the United Nations.

Moreover, Israel has become a key factor in determining the outcome of the United States. You see, this year is the first year of the United States, compared with the previous **, at a time when the social class in the United States is becoming more and more torn apart and the party struggle is becoming more and more cruel, if the current **Biden cannot be re-elected and let Trump, who has been suppressed for four years, come back, it will be bad. Trump, however, has made it clear that he will support Israel 100% unconditionally. Therefore, in order to be re-elected, Biden can only support Israel more hard.

However, when Algeria proposed a cease-fire resolution, the United States just did not do it. In the eyes of the United States, Algeria's proposal of a ceasefire resolution is a challenge to and contempt for US hegemony in the world. The United States, which claims to be the "world's policeman," does not give any face at all. Therefore, no matter who proposes the cease-fire resolution, only the cease-fire resolution proposed by the United States will do. This is really naked hegemonic logic.

It is precisely for this reason that, on the very day that the United States vetoed the Algerian draft resolution "calling for the immediate implementation of a humanitarian ceasefire to be respected by all parties," it brazenly submitted to the Security Council another draft resolution calling on Palestine and Israel to "achieve a temporary ceasefire as soon as practicable." It's really laughable. Old Biden is not only for the sake of interests, but also has to maintain the "face" of the United States that no longer exists.

The United States' repeated vetoes of the cease-fire resolution have put the United States under tremendous pressure in the international arena. If the ceasefire resolution proposed by other UN Security Council members is agreed, the face of the United States will be lost in the United Nations. And Biden will also become the primary target of the "red neck" of the United States.

Alas, the current situation is such that the United States pretends to restrain Israel in order to save a little "face". However, Israel does not want to be restrained by the United States at all, and is not willing to give the United States any face. The so-called "interim ceasefire as soon as practicable" has become an empty phrase.

Judging from the current attitude of the UN Security Council, it is very difficult for the temporary draft resolution proposed by the United States to be adopted. Even if the United Nations adopted the United States draft resolution on a temporary ceasefire, it would not be able to bind Israel in any way. There is no end in sight to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Regardless of whether the draft cease-fire resolution proposed by the United States cannot be passed or passed, the "face" of the United States will not be able to escape the result of being pressed to the ground and rubbed.

On the issue of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, Israel has become the target of public criticism. The United States has also become a loner in the UN Security Council. These two countries, which have gone to opposite sides of the world, will eventually pay a heavy price for their hegemony.

To be continued) In the storm of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the alliance between the United States and Israel has increasingly become the focus of international attention. The United States' repeated veto of the UN cease-fire resolution has not only brought tremendous pressure to the international community, but has also caused widespread controversy at home. In order to maintain the image of the United States in the international community, the elder Biden has done everything possible to support Israel, but this approach is also making the international community's attitude towards the United States more and more cold.

The draft resolution on a "temporary ceasefire" proposed by the United States may seem like a compromise, but it cannot impose real restraint on Israel. In the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, Israel has become increasingly isolated, and the United States has faced accusations from all over the world for its blind support. The intensification of such contradictions not only poses a threat to the international image of the United States, but also further complicates the internal political situation in the United States.

From the point of view of international politics, the hegemonic logic of the United States was even more evident in this incident. The behavior of the United States in abusing power for personal gain and ignoring international morality has aroused the resentment of more and more countries. In this process, China has stood on the side of upholding international fairness and justice, and has become the focus of attention to the development of the situation.

On the one hand, in the United Nations and other international bodies, China has actively called for an end to Israel's acts of aggression and for the Palestinian people. On the other hand, China also takes this opportunity to call on all countries to strengthen international cooperation and jointly safeguard regional peace and stability.

This series of incidents reflects the realities of international relations, and also makes us more profoundly aware that cooperation and conflicts between countries are intertwined and need to be handled more rationally and responsibly. At this challenging moment, China will continue to play a constructive role in promoting the joint efforts of the international community to find a solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and contribute its wisdom and strength to world peace and development.

This turmoil may be just a small part of the long river of international politics, but it is enough to cause us to think deeply about international order and justice. As a responsible major country, China will firmly uphold international peace, urge all parties to resolve disputes through dialogue and consultation, and jointly build a harmonious and stable world. It may be a long process, but it's worth working together.

Related Pages