Recently, a shocking news came that the giant ship sent hundreds of missiles to the Russian army, which attracted global attention. According to Reuters, the missiles came from Iran with a range of between 400-700 kilometers and were delivered directly to Russia. The Caspian Sea became a conduit for this transport, bypassing the Persian Gulf, the Mediterranean Sea and the Turkish Straits to reach Russian ports, making it impossible for the U.S. Navy and Air Force to interfere. The breaking of this news makes people wonder: Where is Putin's confidence? What is the strategy behind the giant ship?
The arrival of the missiles has raised concerns about Russia's military prowess. Can Iranian missiles surpass Russian missiles in range and performance? Can North Korean missiles outperform Russian technology? Although there were different opinions for a while, it is undeniable that the reason why Russia chose to import these missiles must have its own well-thought-out strategic considerations. And for Iranian and North Korean missiles, it is undoubtedly an honor to be part of Russia's strategy. Behind this strategic layout, there may be more complex geopolitical wrestling.
In the international situation full of uncertainties, Putin obviously has his own strategic layout. Iranian and North Korean missiles may be inferior in performance, but their role on the battlefield should not be underestimated. Russia's own Iskander missiles are a sharp weapon, with a range of 300-500 kilometers and an even more jaw-dropping accuracy. On the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield, these missiles are capable of targeted destruction of a variety of targets, from military facilities to bases. However, the question that arises is, how to maintain a constant strike of missiles in a long war? This is not only a technical battle, but also a test of strategic thinking and resource allocation.
However, the use of missiles is not only a contest of technology, but also a challenge to values. Faced with huge and scattered targets in Ukraine, the Russian army must carefully choose the targets to strike. For those targets of great value, such as the Ukrainian army's air defense radar, high-level command posts, etc., it is obviously worth using high-end missiles for precision strikes. And for those targets that are large but relatively low-value, they may be able to be completed by missiles with less performance. After all, in war, the balance between efficiency and cost is crucial.
In the firing line of war, challenges and coping strategies coexist. The Russian army, while large and powerful, also faces a variety of challenges. Although Ukraine's strategic layout is insufficient, it is not easy to attack and defend. What the Russian army must face is Ukraine's scattered and stubborn defensive line, as well as the attention and pressure of the international community on its military operations. Under such circumstances, the Russian army must develop a flexible and changeable strategy, constantly respond to all possible challenges, and ensure the stability and victory of the war situation.
In this perilous war, Putin has demonstrated remarkable leadership and strategic vision. His inclusion of Iranian and North Korean missiles in the strategic system not only strengthened the firepower of the Russian army, but also won more bargaining chips for himself in the international arena. And the missiles sent by the giant ship are even more proof of Putin's confidence. However, the future remains uncertain. Only Putin and his team can constantly think and adjust their strategies to ensure Russia's long-term stability and prosperity.
Putin's strategic layout and the missiles sent by the giant ship are undoubtedly an important event in the international arena. It has not only changed the strategic landscape of the region, but also affected the global political landscape. However, in the face of a complex and volatile international situation, Putin and Russia still face a variety of challenges. It is only through constant reflection and adjustment that we can meet the challenges of the future and ensure the long-term security and stability of the country.