February** Dynamic Incentive Plan Zhihu brushed up on a problem - in fact, simply saying that the relationship between quantities is very virtual, and the real gap has always been something that can be pointed out.
The most typical, let's take the example of nuclear **.
Back then, Ah Zhong and Big Brother turned their faces, and the atomic bomb was only half learned.
So the West said that the Chinese could not build an atomic bomb.
It means that if you are afraid of China, why are you not afraid of ......
In the face of Western nuclear blackmail, the marshal once said: If you take your pants off, you will also get an atomic bomb!
China worked hard to create an atomic bomb and a hydrogen bomb.
At this time, the United States began to hype - China has bullets but no guns, because there are no delivery vehicles (missiles).
It means that China has nuclear weapons but does not have nuclear strike capabilities......, China are you afraid or not, why are you not afraid of ......
In the fourth nuclear test on 27 October 1966, China succeeded in carrying the nuclear warhead by the missile.
Note that the entire path of this missile launch is domestic.
This kind of domestic nuclear missile launch is the only one in the world that China has done.
With a high-risk launch, China proved that it is no longer a bullet without a gun.
It's no longer a matter of bullets and guns, the United States despises you the same, saying that China's missiles do not have enough range to threaten the US mainland, while the United States can threaten the Chinese mainland.
This means that the nuclear threat between China and the United States is quite asymmetrical, and the advantage is in me, which is quite obvious ......China, whether you are afraid or not, you should be afraid of me, you are ......right
So China continued to work hard, and in 1980 it exhausted its navy's home resources, and took the opportunity of a long-distance visit to successfully test the navyDongfeng-5 intercontinental missile
Now it really has the ability to threaten the continental United States (West Coast).
But after this stage, the U.S. military began to hype that the Dongfeng 5 is a liquid-propellant missile, which takes a long time to prepare and requires a fixed silo.
This means that the nuclear deterrence of China and the United States is quite asymmetrical, and the advantage is in me, which is quite obvious ......China, whether you are afraid or not, you should be a little afraid of ......
So China continued to work hard and developed a solid intercontinental missileDongfeng 31g, by the way, the chassis technology of the Dongfeng 31 carrying large trucks, which was introduced from Ukraine in those years.
Now we are as flexible as our opponents, and the Americans say that you do not have enough nuclear warheads......
It means that there is a quantitative gap between China and the United States in nuclear deterrence, and the advantage lies in us, and the numbers are the proof......Are you afraid of China, should you give some face and be afraid of ......?
So China continued to work hard to ......
United States: China is challenging the United States and undermining the rules-based international order.
It is not difficult to see from the evolution of the above rhetoric that whenever you have a slight backwardness, or when he has an advantage, the United States will hype it up in order to build a chain of contempt in order to make you submit. Of course, it's normal if you don't surrender, and the more important significance of this kind of propaganda is to make other third parties feel that the United States is more powerful between China and the United States, and the United States is the boss.
And whenWhen the two sides are equal or close together, they accuse you of undermining the international order.
Hehe......Referring to the evolution of rhetoric on nuclear **, in the military field, we hear more and more voices from the US military, is it that China poses a challenge and undermines the order?
If there is really a big gap between the Chinese and US militaries, rest assured, the United States will definitely tell you.
On the other hand, if the remarks of the British TV program about the gap between China and the United States are several times or several times, with China's temper, we must find a way to develop it and prove it in an appropriate way, otherwise we will not be able to sleep peacefully.
Oh, rest assured!
After the full text, please click on it to read it if you think it's good, or share it.
Ming Window Invites Huayue: Senior writer and joker, spicy and humorous writingOccasional oilGreasy.