Writing account, is it worthy of the Mao Dun Literature Award?

Mondo Culture Updated on 2024-02-15

February**Dynamic Incentive Plan It is undeniable that "Ordinary World" has poured all Lu Yao's efforts, the whole book is more than 800,000 words, and it took six years, but it has been controversial.

Lu Yao's ** when he was twenty years old Lu Yao's ** when he was twenty years old.

Critics said: 1. The writing of this book is too poor, too vernacular, and has no artistic beauty.

2. The writing of this book is like a running account, and some paragraphs are dispensable, just to simply make up the number of words, and the writing is procrastinating, which is not worthy of being a work of art.

3. The character descriptions are monotonous, and they are all quite idealistic, seriously out of touch with reality, and not realistic enough.

As a reader, I was deeply attracted by Lu Yao's writing.

The vernacular text is effortless to read, and what Lu Yao wants to tell can be clearly understood.

Just like Bai Juyi's quatrain, it is easy to understand, but it has been thinking about what it wants to express for a long time.

So the vernacular is not necessarily the flaw of the book.

So the vernacular is not necessarily the flaw of the book.

Ordinary World

Procrastination and overly idealistic character descriptions are the problems of this book, and some of the plots of the whole book can be completely deleted, which is not helpful to what the author wants to express. The idealization and monotony of the character depiction are both fatal problems.

In all fairness,"Ordinary World" is overrated.

Therefore, friends who like Lu Yao must face the objective fact, because only the shortcomings of this book can be understood more deeply and understand Lu Yao.

Lu Yao. It is precisely because of the controversy and different voices that "Ordinary World" continues to grow and influence generation after generation.

Related Pages