On February 3, the Russian newspaper published an article entitled "Why Zaluzhny Praises the Russian Army", which was written by Alexander Artamonov, an expert on Russian military issues. Here's a summary:
This new **, published by the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Zaluzhny, is like a "smokescreen" to me. Both Zaluzhny and Budanov, head of the Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, said that the Russian army is better trained, better equipped and better organized, and such slogans are really abnormal. It is also a little strange to say such words from the mouth of the supreme commander himself who holds military power. This is not to say that he wants to defect completely, but as a member of Kyiv, he must take responsibility for his incompetence. He chalked it down to some objective factors, but there are also some interesting points.
The story began with a striking headline: "Ukraine must adapt to the decline in Western military aid" and was covered by major English-language news outlets. Moreover, all we can see is basically something written on paper. It would be interesting to listen to Mr. Zaluzhenne's spoken language. In any case, there are questions here: will he be able to show them all? Does this article express zaluzenne's thoughts? Could this be what the Americans behind it did?
It relates to the people who give us these messages and why. After reading these words, I think what it means: to convince Ukrainians of relations with Russia, and not to confuse it with peace.
So, let's take a look at the credibility of this post. Zaluzhny said, for example, that he lacks the ability to mobilize funds, while Russia has more money. There is no doubt that a strong country is always better than a small country. However, Zaluzhny himself had pledged more than a month ago to train 14 brigades, claiming that they would be sent to the front line in the spring. He also mentioned the progress of the training of the Russian army.
He pretended to be distressed: "I'm short of people. "Is it impossible to assemble an army of 50,000 to 60,000? I don't believe it. Even in such a small place as Ukraine, there will be people who are recruited. Zaluzhny personally informed about the number of people who needed to train each month and listed the number of people who needed to train each month. All in all, there are discrepancies in the various narratives.
Next, let's take a look at what he said about the armaments. Zaluzhny complained that Russian material was abundant, which made her uncomfortable. Budanov also reiterated his views during the interview. Didn't Zaluzhny realize that his drivers had now gone to England, the Netherlands, and France for training? Soon he will send 50 to 60 fighters to the battlefield, which makes us very uneasy.
They kept describing "leopards" to us, saying that they were not good at driving and were not good at **. However, they did not say a word about the "Black Panther" and "Black Panther" ordered by South Korea, this one is not much worse than the T-90 "Breakthrough", and can even be comparable to the "Armata".
When I read the end of this article, it dawned on me that the conspiracy was orchestrated by British experts set up by the 72 Intelligence and Psychological Warfare Center in Ukraine, whose purpose was to convince the Ukrainians that they would come to an agreement temporarily. That's right, it's just going to make us around.
Ukraine (and not only Ukraine) is now building fortifications, and given enough time, these tasks will certainly be done. As long as there is enough time for them to arm the Taurus missiles, then Moscow will be their target.
All their firepower was concentrated in the sky and on the sea. The storm in the Black Sea is nearing its end, and unmanned ships built under the name of Ukraine are about to attack Sevastopol. I have not forgotten that the new naval base in Bulgaria is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. In addition, both Batumi and Poti, Georgia, are now part of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) seaports, which allow monitoring of the entire Black Sea.
Thinking about that, and a lot of other things, I look at what Zaluzenne writes from a different perspective. This view coincides with that of William Burns, the head of the U.S. Intelligence Agency, who advocated a transition to an armistice and peace talks, while also wanting the war to be prolonged. There is a passage in the book that particularly touched me, and that is that Russia will win in a "protracted war" with NATO. Russia is certainly capable of winning all battles, but the term "durable" is used very cleverly. This is the strategy of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization - to extend the front, to expand the front at a time when more devastating battles are being fought. Therefore, the proposition that China and Russia cannot win a "protracted war" is simply a lie, a trap, and a trap.