The Chinese men's basketball team's first loss to the Japanese men's basketball team in nearly 88 years was not only criticized by fans, but also questioned by head coach Djordjevic. After the game, Djordjevic was interviewed by Chinese reporters, dissatisfied with the reporters' questions and accused the players of not executing their tactics. However, some commentators have pointed out that Djordjevic is not familiar with the Chinese players and that there may be problems with his tactical guidance. Former head coach Deng Huade also believes that Chinese players have limited individual abilities and need to pursue a simple and direct style of play. In the comment area, netizens discussed whether Djordjevic is suitable to continue coaching the Chinese men's basketball team.
This unexpected defeat caused shock and dissatisfaction among many fans. For a long time, the Chinese men's basketball team has always had a clear advantage in the matchup with the Japanese men's basketball team and has won many victories. Therefore, this loss has made people question the strength of the Chinese men's basketball team. What's more, Djordjevic, as the head coach, has also been under great pressure and criticism.
During the interview, Djordjevic's attitude caused dissatisfaction among many. His anger and accusations were seen as a sign of disrespect for journalists and also drew more attention to the issue. Does Djordjevic really understand Chinese basketball culture and the needs of players? Does he really know how to get along with Chinese players and reach their potential? These issues have become a point of contention among fans and pundits alike.
Many believe that Djordjevic is not familiar with the Chinese players and that there may be problems with his tactical guidance. The Chinese men's basketball team's style of play has always been characterized by fast offense and strong interior lines, while Djordjevic emphasizes more complex tactical arrangements and systematic defense. This led to many players not adapting to his guidance, and the tactical coordination was not tacit enough, which led to the loss of the game.
As a former head coach, Deng Ward also questioned Djordjevic's guidance. He believes that Chinese players have relatively limited individual abilities and are more suitable for pursuing a simple and direct style of play.
In the match against Japan, the Chinese team did not seem to play its own characteristics, relying too much on the execution of tactics and ignoring the free play of the players. Deng Huade believes that the Chinese men's basketball team should re-examine its own style of play and find a tactical strategy that suits the team's actual situation.
In the comment area, netizens have different opinions on Djordjevic's continued coaching of the Chinese men's basketball team. Some believe Djordjevic should be fired because he doesn't understand Chinese basketball culture and the characteristics of the players to effectively coach the team. Others believe that he should be given more time and opportunities to adapt to the Chinese basketball environment and achieve better results.
In any case, the Chinese men's basketball team needs to reflect deeply after this loss. They must identify the problem and make adjustments accordingly to improve the team's combat effectiveness and competitiveness. Only in this way can we lead the Chinese men's basketball team to achieve better results in international competitions and win the support and appreciation of fans.
After the Chinese men's basketball team lost to the Japanese men's basketball team for the first time in nearly 88 years, head coach Djordjevic was widely criticized by fans. After the match, he was heated in an interview with a Chinese journalist, accusing the reporter of disrespecting him and accusing the players of not executing the tactics. However, there have been some comments that Djordjevic has problems with Chinese players and tactical guidance. In addition, former head coach Deng Huade also pointed out that Chinese players have limited individual abilities and need to pursue a more simple and direct style of play. In the ** comment area, the majority of netizens began a heated discussion on whether Djordjevic is suitable to continue to coach the Chinese men's basketball team.
When Djordjevic was appointed head coach of the Chinese men's basketball team, it attracted great attention. As a well-known coach in the international basketball world, his arrival not only brought hope to the Chinese men's basketball team, but also left many doubts for fans. In fact, although Djordjevic has accumulated a wealth of experience in international basketball competitions, his adaptation to Chinese players and the Chinese basketball environment did not happen overnight.
From a tactical point of view, Djordjevic was considered to have some problems with coaching. His tactical style emphasizes teamwork and layer-by-layer passing, but Chinese players generally do not have outstanding individual abilities and have a low degree of teamwork, which may lead to the tactics not being fully effective. Some critics have pointed out that Djordjevic was too idealistic in his tactical choices and did not fully take into account the actual abilities and limitations of his players. At the same time, the lack of basic skills of the Chinese men's basketball team itself also increases the difficulty of tactical implementation.
In terms of individual player ability, Djordjevic has relatively limited experience in the Chinese basketball world. The Chinese men's basketball team lacks players with international standards, which makes Djordjevic face a huge challenge in terms of team building. At the same time, the Chinese players, who have a very different style of basketball from foreign countries, make Djordjevic face certain difficulties in understanding and developing their potential. Therefore, Djordjevic needs to be given more time to adapt to the Chinese basketball environment, establish closer ties with the players, and develop more practical and practical tactical plans according to the characteristics of the Chinese players in training.
In addition, former head coach Deng Huade's views are worth pondering. He emphasized the importance of a simple and straightforward style of play, which is an important reminder for Chinese basketball. The Chinese men's basketball team needs to pay attention to the cultivation of basic skills and improve the personal ability of players. Without a strong personal ability as a foundation, it is difficult for even the best tactics to play as well as they should. Therefore, the development of the Chinese men's basketball team needs to pay attention to the characteristics and needs of Chinese players while learning from international experience, and formulate a training plan suitable for the current situation and development direction of Chinese basketball.
Finally, whether Djordjevic is suitable to continue to coach the Chinese men's basketball team is a question that needs to be seriously considered. Although the current results are disappointing for fans, we cannot ignore the international vision and experience that Djordjevic has brought to Chinese basketball. Instead of blaming, perhaps we can treat the problem more rationally and give Djordjevic more time and opportunities to adapt to the Chinese basketball environment and develop together with the Chinese players.