Endless torment? FIFA actively introduced a "blue card" system to deter players from "encroaching."
It looks like the cooperation between the UEFA Football Federation and FIFA will continue. Although the change in the system has caused a lot of complaints and **, they will continue to modify different formats to ensure that "the game runs smoothly". And the punishment for the blue card match is also very unexpected in the news, and we can't help but applaud this move by the Football Association.
A blue badge, as the name suggests, is a penalty for a foul player, similar to a red badge. According to the game's official rules, a "blue card" means that "a player who has committed a more egregious act on the field, such as interfering with a dangerous attack by the opponent, or maliciously attacking the opponent in order to prevent the opponent's attack, will be given a red card for 10 minutes if he also violates the referee." "As you can see, the penalty is only temporary, you can come back after you get your blue card, but that 10 minutes of absence will have a big impact on your number of entries.
In the 1970s, the red and yellow cards were created, and for more than 50 years, this rule has remained largely unchanged. The Blue Card proposal is both historical and innovative. Once passed, the blue card will completely break the rules of the competition. This approach is based on the refereeing guidelines of ice hockey, which involves the number of teams participating and the amount of time the referee spends, which are not comparable to other games. FIFA has explained that they plan to introduce "blue cards" to improve the overall speed of the game and correct the shortcomings of players who are slow to act.
However, as soon as this news came out, it was opposed by many experts. When a team is dealt a blue card, they can pass the ball to the opposing team without attacking. Also, what is the level of dissatisfaction with the various judging criteria? Or is it true that some of the judges are not professional enough to make such a big noise that people can't refute it? Is this a bit too much?
And, suppose we stand in a ball game"Operation"From the standpoint, first throw a few very controversial referees to provoke the opponent, and then limit the number of appearances of the opponent according to the number of appearances of the opponent, so that all kinds of fake falls, ugliness, and small means emerge in endlessly?
So, in practice, this provision has a lot of risks, ie"The original intention is very good"While"Contrary to the original intention"。While it's unclear whether the proposal will pass, it's clear on social networks that the opposition stars are taking a stand, and FIFA can see the clues.