The entry "Wang Xiao was scolded for the roadshow" quickly appeared on the hot search list. This is because when Wang Xiao was conducting a roadshow for the movie "Article 20" in a certain theater, because the theater did not reserve enough time for him, this led to the impact of the next movie. This caused a strong displeasure from a female viewer, who began to complain loudly as a result.
Conflicts arising from non-compliance.
Regarding this point, many netizens have expressed their opinions, they believe that the responsibility lies with the cinema and has no direct relationship with Wang Xiao, and the behavior of the female audience seems too extreme. So, after watching the movie, the female audience decided to calm down and find the theater staff to communicate and solve it. So, we can imagine how this female audience member should act if she has other matters to attend to after the film, in order to ensure that the rest of the journey is not delayed?
Perhaps some people think that they should communicate with the staff of the cinema, so a new question arises: Is it for this reason that the staff of the cinema decided to suspend Wang Xiao's roadshow activities?
It is likely that this will not happen, in short, this female viewer could not protect her right to watch the movie on time through conventional means, she either chose to suffer in silence or chose a more extreme way to protect her rights, and it is clear that she chose the latter. At first glance, this seems to be a provocation to Wang Xiao, but in fact it is a conflict due to non-compliance with the regulations.
The creative capacity of Article 20 was ridiculed.
Frankly, this happened during the roadshow of Article 20, which is actually quite ironic. Although I've never ** the film, I understand that its plot is closely related to justifiable defense, and its core idea is to emphasize the public's right to justifiable defense, which should not be defined simply as a party that attacks each other or seriously injures for a valid reason. If you don't, it may lead to some chaotic situations, such as the fact that the female HR of a company illegally terminated the labor contract not long ago, and they dared to break the law, on the one hand, because there is no cost for breaking the law, and in the worst case, the fee that needs to be paid to the employee; This seemingly small injustice is a moth to the social order, slowly eroding people's faith in justice. On the other hand, the process of protecting employees' rights and interests is difficult and time-consuming, and both adjudication and review can consume a lot of time and energy of the parties, which may cause them to miss the opportunity to find a new job. It is for this reason that bloody incidents about the recovery of wages are not uncommon. When a problem cannot be solved by conventional means, or the process of solving it is extremely difficult and long, there are bound to be people who go to extremes because they lose their minds.
Of course, waiting a little won't have much of a negative effect, but in anything, we should be perceptive, and not following the law often means not following the rules. The reason for the delay of Wang Xiao's roadshow may not only be due to the negligence of the cinema, but also related to the unsatisfactory box office performance of "Article 20". After carefully reviewing the relevant statistics, we found that "Article 20" not only performed poorly at the box office, but also the only film in the first four films of the Spring Festival schedule with a box office proportion lower than the proportion of films, which is undoubtedly a very unfavorable statistic. Despite the large number of stars that "Article 20" has gathered and the producers and distributors have high expectations for it, it is likely that they will not consider using this opportunity to increase their popularity in the face of the strong performances of "Hot and Hot" and "Flying Life 2". Of course, all this is to blame on Wang Nan. While this in itself is understandable, if it takes up audience time for other shows, then it is undoubtedly detrimental to their interests.
Some netizens didn't seem to care too much about this, they thought that the female audience member was acting too contrived, and tried to think from another perspective, what would everyone think if the audience was late and asked the theater to delay the broadcast?
As Lu Xun once pointed out, wasting other people's precious time is actually seeking wealth and endangering life. "Article 20" loudly calls for the protection of the legitimate right of defense, but in real life it infringes on the audience's right to watch the movie on time, how can such a work be called truly powerful?
Summary section. Regardless of whether Wang Xiao's roadshow has been planned for a long time or is improvised, at least there will be a duration, and it should end when the time comes, without the consent of the next audience, the delay of the roadshow in Article 20 is an irrefutable mistake. In the next audience, it is understandable that you will be affectionate, and if you are not accommodating, it is logically understandable. Wang Xiao was scolded for the roadshow