In recent years, the Palestinian-Israeli dispute has once again attracted great attention from all countries in the world. Israel's Time and the Financial Times both reported that Israel** approved a major bill on February 18 that directly vetoed the "international directive" on a permanent peace agreement with the Palestinians. This ruling has sparked great attention and controversy around the world.
In the past, the United States and many other countries have advocated the establishment of a Palestinian state if there is to be a lasting peace in Gaza. However, the Israeli side was extremely disgusted by this decision, and some lawmakers also blamed the United States for facilitating the signing of the Munich Agreement by Israel. This incident reflects the serious differences and conflicts between Palestine and Israel in the process of peace.
The two-State solution has long been seen as a credible solution to the Israeli-Palestinian problem. However, in Israel does not accept the State of Palestine"Unilateral recognition"In the case of two countries, the solution is very difficult. In other words, rather than accepting international rulings, Israel would rather resort to violence and forcibly take possession of Palestinian land. Israel** issued a statement in that regard, saying that it insisted that a solution could be achieved only if no preconditions were attached.
However, this view seems to be very different from that of other countries around the world. Israel's refusal to accept the endorsement of the Palestinian State when it called for "bilateral talks" has led to a lack of opportunities for dialogue in Gaza, which has led to the stagnation of the peace process in Gaza. It was pointed out that Israel may be deliberately delaying developments in order to gain greater benefits from the talks.
During this round of the Israeli-Palestinian war, Israel completely blockaded and controlled Gaza. If so, Israel may want international recognition that it has "occupied" Gaza and does not accept a Palestinian State. Although the United States has repeatedly condemned Israel's actions, its continued military assistance to Israel has raised doubts about whether the West has sufficient strength to defuse the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
At the same time, Russia is also trying to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli contradictions. Palestinian Prime Minister Ashtiye said at a security meeting in Munich on 17 June that Russia has asked all Palestinian factions to hold a meeting in Moscow on 26 June. The move was seen as an attempt by Russia to breathe new life into the situation in Gaza. At present, close collaboration between Israel and the United States has made a peace agreement a nail in the coffin. Therefore, in addition to focusing on the problem, the international community must move forward with the peace process in a more proactive manner.
There are reports that Biden** and Middle Eastern countries such as Egypt, Jordan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and other countries are all working in the coming weeks to set a clear timeline for the creation of a Palestinian state. However, the obvious "rejection" of this by the Israeli side makes this plan confusing. Israel's attitude of "non-recognition" allowed the war to continue. If Israel does not end its use of force, the Palestinian State will be worthless.
In some ways, Israel seems to be focusing more on gaining territory than on other ** or institutions. Under such endless aggression, the state's demonstrations and calls cannot be solved at the root. To this end, Palestine and Israel should take further resolute and vigorous measures to achieve a peaceful settlement between the two countries. This is not only responsible to the Palestinians and Israelis, but has also made a major contribution to promoting peace and stability in the Middle East.