Talking about the topic of ethnic integration, in fact, in addition to China, most countries in the world do not have ethnic integration, and some countries simply do not have ethnic registration, such as Kazakhstan, Rwanda, Russia, etc., because they have suffered the loss of dividing ethnic groups, such as Rwanda, there are no two ethnic groups, which were randomly divided by the colonizers, which later led to the big ** of Rwanda.
Ethnicity is originally a foreign product, a thing in the Western context, derived from a lot of classification criteria, bloodline, religion, language, customs, appearance, etc., can be infinitely subdivided. The British and Americans like to use "ethnicity" to manipulate politics, and if you are like Russia and Ukraine are Slavs, and you are made to have ethnic Russians and Ukrainians, isn't it easy to fight?
There are many countries that consider themselves monoethnic, such as South Korea, Japan, North Korea, and Arab countries, and the European ethnic composition is relatively simple. Japan seems to recognize a minority, the Ainu ethnic group in Hokkaido, with only more than 20,000 people.
The United States, Australia, Canada, and even Tsarist Russia, their national integration is to kill the aborigines, but the world is a good reincarnation, and the heavens forgive whom, like after the economic weakening of the United States, all kinds of "foreigners" are actually no different from the nation, they cannot be integrated, because there is no room for integration in faith and race, and the United States will be very miserable in the next 10-20 years, depending on which race can win the killing.
Although the Arab countries do not engage in ethnic subdivision, the problem is that they engage in infinite subdivisions in religion and divide them into different schools, which is why they fight to the death. This classification of religion is no different from the classification of races, and there will be no way out of integration.
Ethnicity is originally a pseudo-concept, since everyone accepts this term, let's analyze it according to the conventional saying, I think that a country with ethnic integration can have a religion, but it cannot be a religion. In this way, China, North Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, Japan, and some Nordic countries, such as Norway and Denmark, are left with little interest in religion. This temporarily excludes South Korea, which has been controlled by cults.
Since all of the above-mentioned countries are mono-ethnic groups except for China, what is left for China to face is the problem of ethnic integration. Here four conclusions are drawn: first, there is no problem of ethnic integration in a single ethnic group without religion; The second is a mono-ethnic but religious state, which is immortal and unable to integrate, which is caused by the exclusivity of monotheism; The third is the migration led by the United States, which integrates when it is prosperous and disperses when it is defeated, and who wins in the end is integrated; Fourth, China is the country with the best ethnic integration.
Why is it best for China to do the work of ethnic integration, I take India as an example, he founded the country with Hinduism, and he favors Hindu people, then you and other believers will not be able to integrate, which is why they often die in "religious disputes". Since the ancient dynasties, China has been a secular country, and it doesn't matter what you believe below, but the ** organizational organ can't build a country based on what you believe, so he can be a good referee, and when you fight for what you believe in, he can come out to balance, instead of pulling the bias.
Some people say that in ancient times, it was integrated by war, no, unless we learn from the United States to the Indians, otherwise the war cannot integrate the nation, mainly by the productive forces, after the productive forces, a group of people will think about order, and the demand for order will give birth to culture, after the minority people come in, eat and drink well, and then identify with this set of culture, it will naturally be integrated, how can it be so complicated. Why was Meng Yuan driven away, he didn't care about the productive forces, and he didn't recognize the Central Plains culture, the main thing was that he didn't engage in integration, and he took the initiative to divide people into three, six, nine, etc., this kind of integration by war would inevitably make him perish because of the war.
In fact, American culture is not even as good as Indian culture, and Indian culture has compassion for others, and American culture is wearing the skin of God to engage in fraud, and it has not yet fallen apart, because the productive forces can still support it for a while, and if it is weakened, the so-called original integration is all an illusion.
After China weakens, can the nations still be integrated? Will it end the same as the United States, this is not going to be. Because the cultures of the two countries are different, they worship God, while we worship specific people, people who have contributed to the common people, and those who have been erected by the common people.
For example, at the beginning of the founding of the country, when the country was in difficulty, families in the northwest region raised pigs to support the country's construction, and this is the unity in times of difficulty. Like the low-level people in Xinjiang, after turning over, he hung the portraits of the people who liberated them at home to express gratitude, not an ethereal God or something. This kind of hero, he does not belong to any race, and it can even be said that he belongs to all mankind, and this kind of cultural values is the most suitable for different people to blend together.
The ethnic groups explained by Westerners are all wrong, and some people still talk about blood, and dogs only talk about blood! The ethnic groups in Chinese culture are very simple, first of all, everyone is a human being, and secondly, because they live in different places, resulting in one side of the water and soil raising the other side of the people, but the customs are different, which is a broad ethnic division.
If it is a good culture, everyone learns from each other, for example, the Central Plains people use stools and beds, and think that this is suitable for people to sit or sleep. If it's not good, go to educate it, the ancient exile system is very good, put the highly educated ** in Hainan, Heilongjiang, Xinjiang, such as Su Shi, Han Yu, Lin Zexu, etc., every time they go, they will inevitably make the local atmosphere and culture refreshing. So I suggest that if we want to continue to do a good job of ethnic integration now, we have to decentralize the experts, who are a bit of a scourge to stay in the city.
China is a very tolerant country, any good one is willing to learn, and the object of learning, does not care whether it is a big country or a small country, just like some people when it comes to learning objects, they say that Europe and the United States, and the countries that learn from the United States are all over, and none of them have a good end. Later, I studied finance with the United States, not because he was good at finance, but because he was studying how to avoid being harvested by the United States. China's economy is learning from Singapore, and in terms of social structure, it hopes to learn from the small Nordic countries, where the gap between the rich and the poor is very small.
In ancient China, there was no concept of nationality, and it was often said that the Central Plains, Xiyi, Dongyi, Nanren, and Beiren, and now it is no different from saying that you are from Henan, he is from Jiangsu, you are from the city, he is from the countryside, you are from the second ring, and he is from the sixth ring. The integration of this group of people is the integration of high productivity and high culture, low productivity and low culture. In 1902, Liang Qichao took the lead in putting forward the modern concept of nationality in China, and in order to integrate and not subdivide it further, he directly put forward the concept of "Chinese nation".
If Europe is divided into ethnic groups, the Germanic people, Gypsies, and Greeks can be divided into at least 88 ethnic groups, and if India is subdivided into ethnic groups, it can be divided into 200 ethnic groups, but they are not so stupid, one says that we are all Europaans, and the other says that we believe in Hinduism are all one family. You see, fusion is as simple as that.
In Chinese history, there is a "Yidi theory", which is not a distinction between nationalities, but the difference between agricultural civilization and grassland nomadic civilization, the ancient Chinese have always had free migration and long-standing and regardless of ethnic and intermarriage customs, rarely distinguish ethnic groups by language or living habits, there is no need to pay too much attention to national identity, these are all terms exported by Western barbarians when they were developed.
It is not a good thing to always care about which nationality you are, and the Jews always benefit from the fact that they are a chosen nation, and they refuse to integrate and learn from each other, so they have been unlucky in the past, and they will inevitably be unlucky in the future.