As the global situation continues to be tense and the issue of ** is being taken seriously by all countries, China's position at the center of the storm is becoming more and more concerning. In recent years, China has continued to improve its legislation in the areas of espionage and intelligence, for which the CIA has repeatedly criticized China. In the face of the rhetoric of the United States, China has strengthened its determination to suppress spies. China officially announced that Australian spy Yang Jun was sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve, and all his property was confiscated. This news has aroused tremendous repercussions in the international community, especially in the United States and Western countries.
Yang Jun, who grew up in China, was later bought by the United States and Australia to operate as an Australian spy in China.
China finally revealed his true identity through a book he wrote. This is just the beginning of the story. In 2019, China** successfully arrested Yang Jun, who had just returned to China. It is not until today, four years later, that a Chinese court has handed down a formal verdict. There are two main reasons for this: first, Yang Jun's identity as a spy involves many countries and has a long life, which has brought a lot of challenges to China; Second, Australia** regards it as a face issue, and has repeatedly slowed down China's trial of the case for various reasons. Despite repeated obstructions from Australia, the Chinese court still handed down its verdict before the Chinese New Year.
The verdict sparked strong dissatisfaction in Australia, and the Australian prime minister even said that he would save lives. China** behaved rationally and modestly throughout the case. On the one hand, China retains Yang Jun's various procedural rights and fully respects Australia's rights, such as consular rights. During the verdict, China also specially arranged for Australian personnel to observe the verdict. On both the public and private side, China** has handled it in a way that makes it difficult to find fault with.
Australia's extreme dissatisfaction with China's verdict seems unreasonable. China** has made it clear that it will retain Yang Jun's litigation rights and fully respect Australia's rights.
While Australia** has criticized China's approach in the international community, the way China and Australia have handled it has shown that there is a difference between the two.
Notably, around the time of China's official verdict, four countries accused the so-called "Chinese hackers," including the United States, the Philippines, Australia, and the Netherlands. Although this kind of remark caused a temporary wave, in the face of the provocation of the United States, which is recognized as a major country in cyber theft, China has shown a deep response. China is determined to suppress espionage, and the Yang Jun case is the best proof of this.
In this regard, what do you think in front of the screen, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!
*All from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete.