The principal has never attended a class but serves the most, no wonder netizens ask students to be fully attended!
The principal didn't have classes after the week, but he actually had the most classes in the whole school. Netizen: No wonder students are forced to have.
For several years, after-school services have been provided throughout the country, and despite various problems, after-school services have become a major feature of schools everywhere, and almost all schools, including secondary schools, offer after-school services.
However, we also understand that after-school services are not free and require a fee from parents. The original purpose of this fee was to provide some subsidy for class teachers to carry out the service after hours. Due to the large number of students and the large number of students participating in after-school services, the cost of after-school services has become a significant expense, which has attracted a lot of attention.
Recently, a teacher said online:"After-school fees should be given to the service providers, but the principal of our school has not participated in an after-school service once a semester, but he has the fifth highest after-school fee in the school"。This caused a lot of dissatisfaction among netizens. One netizen commented:"You're not bad, our principal didn't participate in a single after-school service, but he got the highest fee in the school. "Some netizens added:"Your principal is good, and the principal in Huanggang can't even get 20%. "
The remarks angered many netizens, one of whom said:"It turns out that this is the reason why the school requires students to participate in after-school services"。It can be seen that the school has found a way to make money.
First, after-school services are a huge expense for schools that are already stretched thin. In some developed provinces, parents are also obliged to bear part of the cost. However, due to the impact of the epidemic in recent years, many localities are financially constrained, and the cost of after-school services in most provinces is basically borne by parents. In this case, it has become the norm for schools to charge parents and then subsidize teachers.
Fees vary from district to district, but no matter how much they are, they are a huge amount of money for schools that are already struggling financially. Taking a district as an example, the cost of 450 yuan per student per semester does not seem to be much, but a class usually has about 60 students, and the school has nearly 40 classes of teachers, and the after-school service fee per semester is 1.08 million yuan, which is quite a considerable amount. Therefore, how to distribute this money becomes a big problem.
Second, the distribution of after-school fees is unfair, and teachers are helpless. For the distribution of after-school fees, local education departments have corresponding regulations, and in principle, they are inclined to front-line teachers. However, front-line teachers do not have decision-making power in schools, and the distribution between schools is relatively unfair.
For example, some schools include all teachers in the payment of after-school services, even though very few teachers actually participate in after-school services. In order to take care of all teachers, the school has created a series of positions, including service leaders, logistics teachers who control the classes, and teachers who are in charge of hygiene. Although the workload of these positions is not large, the after-school service fees they receive after work every day are quite substantial. The principal explained:"They all serve the class teacher, and if the service is not good, the class teacher will not do his job so well, so they all have a share. "And being a principal is indispensable. In some schools, teachers don't know what the specific principal's salary is, because the school never publishes it.
As for what some industry insiders say is that the majority or 20% of the leadership is the case, it does exist in some schools. This type of assignment makes teachers feel powerless.
Thirdly, although after-school services are voluntary in principle, in practice, parents are obliged to enroll their children. There are several situations that can make parents feel compelled to do so:
First, many schools have changed their schedules to after-school service schedules. Students who do not participate in after-school services cannot participate in the original morning and evening self-study, and parents are obligated to let their children participate.
Second, teachers in some schools have made it clear that they also attend classes after school. Although classes were not allowed after school hours at first, some teachers continued to do so in order to improve school grades. In order not to leave their children behind, parents are obliged to send their children to class.
Therefore, although after-school services are voluntary, parents also feel more or less responsible to participate. Many parents are reluctant to let their children participate in after-school services, but they are afraid of affecting their children's learning, so they can only reluctantly make it difficult.
In general, the original intention of the state to establish after-school services was good, but in some schools it has become negative. After-school services were originally intended to cater for parents who did not have time to take care of their children after school, but in some schools they have become large class sizes, resulting in an increased burden on students. In the current context of exam-oriented education, many schools have turned after-school services into classes, thus increasing the burden on students. As for the distribution of tuition fees, there is currently no unified standard across the country, and it is indeed difficult to achieve fairness, justice and openness.
Finally, what do you think about this? Feel free to share!
The author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author supports any laws, rules, opinions, actions, and is not responsible for the authenticity of the information contained in this article. The author of this article is not responsible for any problems caused by the above content or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal responsibility.