Universal Life Guide Universal Education Guide In-service candidates have different methods of studying for the law exam than those who are studying full-time. Especially for on-the-job, older, and interdisciplinary candidates, passing the law exam actually has an advantage over full-time revision students, as long as they master the method, it will be easier to pass the exam.
The legal profession involves all aspects of social life, and in-service candidates have more life experience and can better understand the deep-seated logic of law formulation, which are the advantages of in-service candidates, and we should make good use of these advantages to form our own legal thinking and better integrate into legal learning.
The Law Exam is an exam that tests more breadth than depth of knowledge. That is to say, candidates need to have a shallow understanding of legal knowledge, but there are many disciplines involved, which makes many people feel that they have forgotten about this. For a method, I just found a little bit and felt that the learning was over, and I always had a bad grasp of the degree of review.
This feature of the law exam makes it difficult for many students to pass the exam, because they study deeply and take the test shallowly, and often think too much when answering questions, but are bypassed into it. However, this feature is more friendly to interdisciplinary candidates, because they don't have a lot of time to study in depth, and they don't have too many ideas about the knowledge points, but they can answer the questions correctly at once.
For older, in-service, and interdisciplinary candidates, the most difficult thing is to fight against their own demons. The impression of students taking the law exam is that they often like to give themselves negative psychological hints, they give themselves a curse, and often unconsciously think that their ability is not good, the foundation is not good, and the worst thing is that their memory is not good.
We have to believe in the saying: everything you want will come true!It's true, you think about good things, and good things will be achieved in the end;Thinking about failure, achievement is naturally failure. Some people think that what they think is nothing, but in fact, you ignore the fact that you are not firm in your beliefs. You have only one good result in your heart, but there are countless reasons and reasons for failure, recall if this is not the case, you think about many bad things than good things, so you will never forget, there will be an echo!
Once you have overcome the psychological barrier, you have to have a reasonable approach. I did a set of ** courses on revision methods, and the results of the students who used them were very good, and I concluded that many times the method is greater than the effort. Because the wrong effort can get you off the rails.
If you still have more than half a year to review, I suggest that you review in the order of theoretical law, constitutional law, administrative law, criminal law, civil law, criminal procedure, civil litigation, administrative litigation, business and economic knowledge, and the three countries. Because this order will allow you to lay the foundation more solidly. Many people think that theoretical law is a discipline of memorization, but I think this is a discipline of understanding, the foundation of law, and theoretical law runs through the laws of other departments. Putting procedural law together is to have a contrast and make it easier to remember.
In terms of revision methods, I recommend that you listen to lectures rather than read books. Listening to lectures is passive, and you don't know when you will slip through the lectures. Many students are listening to online classes, which can be started at any time, at double speed**. Everything has two sides, and while it brings convenience, it makes you not know how to cherish it. It's a waste of time. Because it can be played back, your attention span is very short, and because you listen to the teacher tell a "law story", you are very relaxed and give up deep thinking, so the efficiency is actually very low. I asked my students to listen to the lecture only once and read the book several times. Listening to lectures is cramming, and reading books is chewing. Think about it and see if what I said makes sense.
Because reading books is boring, many people can't persevere, and they can't find the key points in the books, thinking that these books make you feel painful, and after reading them, you forget them all, how to break them?
The magic weapon of taking the vocational qualification examination is the real question. I think this is the magic weapon for almost all exams in our country at present, including the children's college entrance examination and postgraduate entrance examination.
But everyone has entered a misunderstanding, that is, brushing questions. I was especially afraid that some classmates would find me and say these two words. Basically, the people who can still find me with confidence and ask the reason are all people who have done tens of thousands of questions. They think they work hard enough, and they use the right methods in the world, but there are no good results!In the end, they define themselves as stupid or unfit for law.
In fact, it is really that you only see the appearance of brushing questions, but you have not achieved the true meaning of brushing.
I told my classmates that brushing is to use a brush to clean the edges and corners, not to flush with water. Without questions, it is better to do ten questions than to do one question seriously. If you can do a question more than three times, then the knowledge points involved in the question must be fine. Don't forget, read the book a hundred times, and you will see its righteousness!
Students should not only talk about the fast, but only the quantity. The correct way to do the question is to open a question, find out the test points in the question, recall the relevant knowledge points of the test point, and ponder it repeatedly. If you have taken the real question once, you will not take it again, but the test center in the real question will change the tricks. We must cherish the past papers and use them well. When I took the exam, I didn't finish the lecture, and I didn't finish reading the lecture, but I did the real questions three times, not to look at the question stem and choose the answer, but to seriously reproduce the analysis, and try it in this way.
In addition, it is recommended that if you don't know the quality of the questions, it is recommended that you only use the real questions. It's a bit naïve for you to bet on mock questions to pass the exam. Doing a bad question will be a waste of time at least and will lead you astray.
I would like to give you two more sincere suggestions: one is not to become a data controller, and the other is not to blindly compare.
Review should be serious and down-to-earth.
The right way in the world is the vicissitudes of life!
To the friends of the 24-year law exam, I wish you twice the result with half the effort and successfully go ashore!
If you have any questions on the way to the law exam, please pay attention and leave a message. We look forward to sharing tips with you on how to revise.
Law Exam [Super Talk] Law Exam Law Exam Experience Post