Today, I won't make up the situation, don't talk nonsense, and directly simulate how the trading system is built from the perspective of big A***.
In advance, the focus of this article is on the derivation order of the logic of thinking, and it does not matter what the actual content of the trading system is.
Let's talk about the big A first.
Big A** is very special and basically different from all other markets. Not to mention anything else, some time ago, the epic level of the domestic **European line** was basically not deduced in the big A. If the margin system is converted, there should be about 30 up limits and seven or eight down limits in the European line.
To be a big A, aesthetics is very important, and rhythm is also important. But these two things are relatively imaginary, and they are not physical objects that can be described concretely. At the end of the day, you have to know what kind of ticket logic is harder, and these things are up to the wise.
For example, I have so many votes in the car sector, and I actually like Thalys the most. In terms of my aesthetics, he is the best in my heart, and you have to ask me why I can't actually explain it very clearly.
I can't say anything about aesthetics, just skip it. But at the end of the day, what everyone thinks is good, the probability is good, and it doesn't matter what you think of it.
The rhythm, in fact, also depends on the actual combat experience, but in the final analysis, try not to relay the next day of the big climax, and try not to operate five minutes before the opening of the next day. These two, from the perspective of rhythm, are generally worse times. Keep these two points in mind and you'll definitely be able to avoid more than half of the pits.
Aesthetics and rhythm are actually things that cannot be taught, because both rely on a sense of discing and vision. A large part of the leading strategy is to rely on the player's own superb sense and vision.
* Need to be pure, simple. The more you think about it, the more you will be wrong.
For example, the dragon head strategy is like this.
Many players have a misunderstanding of the dragon head strategy, they think that there is a dragon head almost every day, and if you get rid of a dragon head today, you will get a new dragon head tomorrow.
In fact, the faucet is like this, only when you come out do you know that you are the faucet, and if you don't come out, you are definitely not the faucet.
Therefore, there is a great overlap between the number board strategy and the leading strategy, and the height advantage accounts for a large proportion. With the core of the concept, A is a 5-board board, which is more recognizable than B with 3 boards. A's faucet call will also be higher.
But in the final analysis, it is nothing more than the highest board relay, the second highest relay, and the same position PK. The three are the most common.
There are generally very few votes to be elected, and it is estimated that there are only five or six after screening. There are only one or two that can be done. If you don't consider the probability of personal strength, the overall winning rate can exceed 50%, which is considered a strong leading player.
You see, this thing is a knockout game, and only one or two of the five or six votes will survive. If you make a mistake, you won't have time to switch on the same day, and the next day you will either not be able to switch, or you will not dare to switch if you are given the opportunity.
Almost 90% of the big A** players face all the troubles in this.
Based on this, the summary can be found.
1.A faucet is a faucet only when it comes out, and it is not a faucet if it doesn't come out. After a wave of relays, it is clear who is the most core ticket afterwards.
2.The core ticket, as long as it is not a particularly small wave of themes, there will be a reverse draw or a second wave in most cases.
So, is it possible to design a trading system that specializes in leading the second wave?
Actually, you can.
Before designing, we must first understand a concept, what is the underlying logic of the trading system.
It can be said that if the market is a sea, then every player is a fisherman, and the trading system is a net woven by one's own hands. Your net can't be the size of an ocean, and you can't catch all the fish. So, you just have to keep an eye on the coverage of your nets. If someone else has big fish in their nets, it has nothing to do with you. If the big fish don't get into your nets, it has nothing to do with you.
You're better than a fisherman who goes out to sea without a net, and don't think that every big fish should go into your net.
That is, don't envy others for catching a big fish, and don't regret that the big fish doesn't drill your net at all.
In other words, if you don't understand what is outside the trading system and you don't understand it, you shouldn't do it. That's someone else's fish, and it has nothing to do with you.
Many people can't see through this, so it's very painful to lose money, so they have to find a reason for losing money and analyze what went wrong with themselves. Is it the wrong posture to buy? The wrong time to buy? Or was it smashed by some kind of travel money?
It's all redundant, like an honest small town questioner, he has to chase a night girl to talk about pure love. It's a matter of course to be toyed with again and again. It has nothing to do with the fact that your gift to the night girl is white roses and red roses.
If you do too much of this, you will feel stupid and fear the market. If you are a little more stupid, it will become a lifetime black for a certain tourist seat.
Okay, I want to avoid all the pitfalls above, so I'm going to focus on the faucet or the core second wave, that's always okay, right?
Yes, there is nothing wrong with it.
Then this trading system is very simple.
1.Record all that has become the faucet or core of the market consensus.
2.Wait for him, wait for him to stop and stop, wait for him to fall to the limit, wait for him to put a huge amount of killing, wait for him to adjust at will, you are unmoved.
3.No matter how he falls, anyway, you just wait for the first positive candle after the continuous black candle to buy in.
4.In this first white candle, the position of the stock price is not important, and the position of your ** is not important. Therefore, whether it is low suction, playing board, or halfway, you can, but you can't be anti-nuclear. But before you do, you must be sure that this is definitely the first positive candle after the continuous negative candle, and the volume is larger than yesterday. It doesn't matter how big it is, just big it's big. The volume shows that many funds in the market have refocused their eyes here, and the heat and popularity have returned. (You can refer to this thing, but don't take it as absolute truth.) The foreign exchange market is super large, much larger than the market size of big A, but there is no such thing as quantitative energy in the foreign exchange market. ）
5.The stop loss is also simple, or after you buy it, you will directly line up for the intraday drop limit the next day. Either the next day's ** price will be lower than the lowest point of the first white candle, then the stop loss will be 3 minutes before the afternoon**.
You see, such a leading two-wave trading system I summarize the composition of thinking.
1.Only make faucets.
2.Avoid all off-site factors such as aesthetics, rhythm, breaking news, and travel seats.
3.Buy the extreme right side, it must be after a wave of decline, and then go to enter the market.
4.The stop-loss principle is clear and simple.
5.There are three kinds of results, eat a reverse draw and leave the next day, eat a second wave, stop loss. Two of the three outcomes are the results of making money. And the simple relay, the next day will either make or lose, there is no third result.
So, all in all, you just need to tinker with some small details that are in line with your personal approach. All that's left is to double-check all the core tickets in the past two years, and your buy point is at **.
But the trading system is like this, the simpler, more straightforward and straightforward the trading system, the fewer opportunities it has, and the higher the execution required. The better the execution, the higher the win rate.
In fact, the above stop-loss conditions, I still said that it is a bit complicated. In the final analysis, the stop-loss condition of this trading system is that you are sure that there is no reversal here, there is no second wave, then the stop loss is very simple.
Then, you only need to focus on the win rate of the operation, and the rest can be used as a secondary condition.
Simple, right? The trading system is actually the embodiment of your trading logic.
In fact, many quotations from the tour capital, hoping to convey to us are not the charts of the sea, he is just describing what his fishing nets look like.
But many people interpret these words as nautical charts, thinking that as long as they memorize and eat thoroughly, they can find the treasure in the shipwreck.
For example, me, it is more difficult for me to identify with players who only play boards, very simply, because I don't rely on the limit to confirm the confirmation. Therefore, when I operate in the big A, I often don't play the board when I have a big grasp of confirmation. If I go to play the board, it means that my grasp is relatively low.
So my success rate is quite low, no more than 50%, but the success rate is high halfway, definitely more than 60%.
Helplessly. The idea is just for reference, but I think it's quite valuable.