"Meteor Garden" don't shoot hard, put the six versions together, the American version of the casting is spicy, and the Japanese version is aesthetically jumpy
In the entertainment industry, remakes of classics are nothing new. Among them, "Meteor Garden" can be described as one of the focuses of attention. Since its release in 2001, the Taiwanese version has undergone several adaptations, including Japanese, Korean, and Chinese mainland versions, and even an American version. Each release has attracted a large audience, but it has also sparked numerous controversies.
First of all, the success of the Taiwanese version is still fresh in the audience's memory. It has won wide recognition for its novel plot, real emotions and excellent cast, and has become a classic in the hearts of a generation.
However, this also poses a huge challenge for subsequent adaptations. The Korean version of "Boys Over Flowers" and the Japanese version of "Boys Over Flowers" were great local success and set an example for the remake of Meteor Garden. The Chinese mainland version, on the other hand, has attracted much attention for its modern style and novel storyline, but it has also been questioned by fans of the original version.
However, the American version is a sight to behold. Despite the controversy over casting, it has won a new audience with its bold adaptation and modernization of the original book. The success of the American version highlights the lifestyle and mentality of contemporary teenagers, allowing the audience to feel the reflection on youth and friendship in laughter and tears.
Finally, the Japanese version of the aesthetic is considered the most innovative. It combines anime and reality, and shows an unusual aesthetic feeling through peculiar pictures and plots, making the audience feel as if they have stepped into a fantasy world. This kind of aesthetic jumping attempt makes the audience have a new thinking about traditional aesthetic standards.
However, it's worth noting that while these versions have their own strengths, there are also traces of hard shots. Sometimes, the adaptor pursues "novelty" too much, but the result is that the audience does not feel the charm of the original. The collision between contemporary pop culture aesthetic standards and classics undoubtedly raises an important question: should we respect the essence of the original while pushing through the new?
Perhaps, this problem is not limited to the entertainment industry. In our lives, we often encounter similar situations. For example, should we ignore traditional aesthetic standards when pursuing personalized fashion trends? Should you ignore your heart's desires in your pursuit of career success?
Perhaps, we can find the answer from different versions of Meteor Garden. Each version has its own uniqueness, just as each of us has a unique trajectory in life. But at the same time, they all convey the same message to us: respect the original, respect the tradition, but also dare to innovate and dare to break through.