Overturned? The anchor with Hui Tong was accused of plagiarizing copywriting, and the response came

Mondo Entertainment Updated on 2024-02-01

Just yesterday, the blogger @杨蕃語艺术 posted ** saying that the anchor in the live broadcast room of "Hehui Tong" plagiarized his original **copywriting, and the anchor involved responded, "It belongs to mutual achievement, you can communicate if you have problems, and you dare to do it." ", which attracted the attention and heated discussions of netizens.

The blogger said in ** that after being reminded by fans, it was found that the copywriting used by the anchor in Dong Yuhui's live broadcast room was "almost exactly the same in content, structure, and terminology", and the copywriting was 90% similar to his own original**.

The blogger said that the seller should declare the copywriting of others**, which is a common rule in the industry and a respect for the original, you just need to declare it.

So the same knowledge point, different people to explain, if the ideas and terms are similar, is it ***? Netizens expressed their opinions on this issue.

Some netizens think that you can interpret the same content in your own language, and if you interpret it in the language and framework that others have interpreted, it is plagiarism.

Some netizens also believe that just stating the facts is not something that anyone can say the same content, and it cannot be identified as plagiarism.

In the face of questions from bloggers and netizens, the anchor who traveled with Hui also responded, "In the field of art or live broadcasting, everyone achieves each other, and if you have any questions, you can communicate in a timely manner......."”

Talking about plagiarism questioning as "mutual achievement", is it someone else who has made you, or have you made someone else? This response is really speechless.

People who do self-** should understand a platform rule: if the copywriting of other people's ** is directly extracted and published or regenerated**, it will be considered plagiarism or transfer on many platforms, and there is no clear provision on whether the anchor can directly quote other people's original copywriting in the live broadcast room.

What are your thoughts on this?

Related Pages