The evidence for conviction for the crime of embezzlement usually includes the following:
Evidence of the subject of the crime: Evidence that proves that the criminal suspect is an employee of a company, enterprise, or other unit, such as a labor contract, employment certificate, etc.
Evidence of Convenience of Position: Evidence to prove that the criminal suspect took advantage of his position, such as the scope of his duties, powers, etc.
Evidence of embezzlement: Evidence that the suspect has committed acts of embezzlement of the unit's property, such as financial accounts, transaction records, surveillance videos, etc.
Evidence of property ownership: Prove that the property that has been embezzled belongs to the unit, which can be confirmed through relevant financial records, contracts, property rights certificates, etc.
Evidence of the amount of the crime: Determine the specific amount of the property that has been misappropriated, which may involve financial statements, audit reports, bank statements, etc.
Other evidence: such as the criminal suspect's confession and justification, witness testimony, documentary evidence, physical evidence, etc., to assist in proving the facts of the crime.
It is important to note that the specific evidentiary requirements and conviction criteria may vary depending on the specific circumstances of the case. In judicial practice, the procuratorate will investigate and collect evidence according to the specific circumstances of the case, and synthesize various evidence to determine whether the crime of embezzlement in public office is constituted. If you have questions about a specific case or need more detailed information, it is advisable to consult a legal professional. They can provide more accurate legal advice and guidance on a case-by-case basis.