Zelensky, Ukraine**, frowns tightly and has anger on his face. On January 1, an interview with The Economist magazine made him quite dissatisfied. He was furious, but not because of the Russian offensive, nor because of the poor performance of the Ukrainian army, but because Europe refused to lend a helping hand!
Zelensky could not sit still, and in the interview he called on Western countries to increase financial and military assistance to Ukraine. He accused both the West and Ukraine's own military enterprises of losing their sensitivity to emergencies and existential threats. He was outraged by the inaction of the West, as if to shout: "Europe, stop sitting idly by!".”
In addition to calling for aid, Zelensky proposed a plan for Ukraine to save itself: strengthen local military production and prevent dependence on Western aid. In his opinion, Ukraine cannot rely only on external support, but must build its own military industry to meet its own armament needs. These words can't help but remind people of the bold words of "God helps those who save themselves".
Zelensky bluntly shouted to the United States: "Give us money or **, you are supporting yourself, saving your own children, not our children." This kind of direct statement makes people seem to see the modern "rabble" in the political arena. He warned that if Ukraine is defeated, Russia will be closer to war, and European countries should take the initiative to lobby the United States to support Ukraine for their own interests. This can't help but make people feel that international relations are so straightforward.
However, among the calls for support for Zelensky, there is no shortage of criticism for his performance in the war situation. In the battle of Zaporozhye, he delayed the offensive and missed the opportunity to strike at the Russian army. This hesitation has caused Ukraine to lose the first opportunity, which makes people question the decisiveness of **.
List of high-quality authors
Zelensky's anger stems from the indifference of the West. In his opinion, both Western countries and Ukraine's own military enterprises have lost their sensitivity to the current state of emergency. Europe seems to be turning a blind eye to Ukraine's plight, and this indifference has made Zelenskyy's anger boil even more. However, this also raises the question: why is the West so indifferent to Ukraine?Is it because Ukraine's geographical location is not important enough, or is it the West's hesitation about Russia that makes it difficult for them to make a move?This issue is undoubtedly a sensitive topic in international politics.
Under the cover of anger, Zelensky launched an appeal to Europe. He asked European countries to stop sitting idly by and watch Ukraine's plight and increase financial and military assistance to Ukraine. Such calls are fraught with the expectation of joint action, which, however, is often fragile in international affairs. Whether Europe's appeal to Zelensky will make a difference, whether it will re-examine Ukraine's position in international affairs, has become an unpredictable contest in international relations.
In addition to calling for assistance, Zelensky put forward a plan for Ukraine to save itself. He advocated that Ukraine should strengthen its indigenous military production to prevent over-dependence on Western aid. This proposition reflects the fact that a country should maintain its independence and strength in the face of external threats. However, this also raises questions about Ukraine's strength. Does Ukraine have enough technology and resources to develop the indigenous military industry?Will this self-help be effective in a short period of time?These questions draw more attention to Ukraine's internal strength and development potential.
Zelensky's shouting to the United States is even more direct. He said that to support Ukraine is to support yourself, give us money or **, you are saving your own children, not our children. This straightforward statement has a strong air of realism and reveals some inescapable truths in international relations. However, it remains to be seen whether the United States will respond positively to Zelensky's call and devote more resources to supporting Ukraine. U.S. decision-making is not only constrained by domestic politics, but also involves a complex relationship with Russia, which complicates the whole situation.
However, in the support for Zelensky, there is no shortage of criticism of his performance in the war situation. In the battle for Zaporizhzhia, he delayed the offensive, causing Ukraine to lose the first opportunity. This miscalculation calls into question the military wisdom of the first and also makes Ukraine lose its dominant position in international support.
In the Battle of Avadiivka, Zelensky helped the Russian army achieve the goal of annihilating the main force of the Ukrainian army at a critical moment. Such a decision not only deprives Ukraine of its ability to resist, but also weakens the will for international support. Whether Zelensky is fit to lead the country to victory in this crisis has become a hotly debated topic.
Zelensky's decision was also widely controversial during the Battle of Avadiivka. His decision to throw elite troops into the encirclement led to the loss of Ukraine's ability to resist the Russian advance. This kind of decision not only affects the war situation in Ukraine, but also makes European and American countries hesitate to support.
Who exactly deprived Ukraine of its ability to resist?Some say the blame lies with Zelensky. His mistakes in the battles of Zaporizhzhia and Avadiivka have devastated Ukraine's vitality, and his decisions have taken Ukraine out of the focus of international support and raised doubts about whether he is a leader who can truly lead the country to victory.
Behind the global gaze, Zelensky's anger may not be entirely without reason. However, in this chaotic and dangerous moment, we can't help but ask, Zelensky, what the hell are you?Are you the savior of Ukraine, or a "pig teammate"?Are your decisions really in the best interests of the country, or are they just to keep your political position?This question may only be answered by time, but the answer may not be so easy to accept.