I deleted the news, just like when Zhang Wuji's parents were besieged in Guangmingding, it was 'to die to show my will', just to express my attitude and position. ”
On the evening of February 27, Dong Yuhui, who has his own traffic physique, replied to the controversy of emptying Weibo during the live broadcast. When Dong Yuhui talked about his views on hot searches, he gave an example of his previous talk about not understanding the topic of female teachers doing nail art classes on the hot search, he said that this was originally his unintentional talk, but it was misunderstood as discrimination against women, and he couldn't accept such misunderstood things repeatedly. He also called "instinctively fleeing and emptying Weibo" This is the anger of the horseman, and it is a spiritual victory of Ah Q.
There is ** that this is Dong Yuhui evading **supervision, thinking that he "floated". However, which platform to choose is the scope of his personal choice, and it should not be within the public discussion.
Many netizens took the previous small essay incident as an example, thinking that Dong was able to get the best support in the hot searches again and again, and it was inseparable from the help of the hot searches, and thought that Dong's expression of disgust with the hot searches was "revenge". It should be pointed out that the public should not have the idea of repaying Dong Yuhui's gratitude. The public's support for him when he was in turmoil should be his insistence on right and wrong, rather than his vulgar "favor" to Dong Yuhui. Even if Dong Yuhui is asked to repay his kindness, he doesn't have to be obsessed with it, which is reflected in his tolerance for hot searchesI can't think that I have helped Dong Yuhui, so I think that I can deprive Dong Yuhui of the right to choose.
We expect public figures to hold on to more ethical standards, but we cannot ask public figures to hold on to the standards of moral kidnapping.
The people who surround public figures like Dong Yuhui and gradually "distort" them are extreme supporters on one side and extreme pickers on the other. The former do not admit that their idols' words and deeds are not perfect; The latter did not allow his words and deeds to be purely recognized and applauded, and the two sides began a round of separation. Where there is demand, there is supply, and the platform sits in the middle of it to reap the benefits.
While we are talking about Dong Yuhui, we are also accelerating the de-"Dong Yuhuiization". In one hot search discussion after another, some extreme discussants have airdropped individual values on Dong Yuhui, in order to complete the extended narrative of personal will on public figures, in these narratives, Dong Yuhui is either a flawless "saint" or a "villain" with different hearts, and it seems that there can no longer exist in another form. All parties are mixed in the ranks of this online parade, actively or passively, positively or reversely, to join Dong Yuhui's hot search god-making movement.
But there is one thing that seems to be overlooked, and that isAs a natural person, does Dong Yuhui have an obligation to endure all this?
In the "second creation" of Dong Yuhui, through wishful thinking, he continued to increase the weight of Dong Yuhui and create a "Dong Yuhui" that he thinksAfter depriving Dong of his personal values in the collective unconscious, he turned to all kinds of discipline for public figures, hoping that he could cooperate unconditionally and become a tool for himself to express his values, but the real Dong Yuhui has long been left in the corner.
To a certain extent, the objectivity of Dong's personal words and deeds is no longer important, and it is important whether his body on the Internet can serve as a stage for the free tearing of values from all walks of life and the harvesting of traffic without taboos for capital. WhileDong Yuhui, who seems to be feasting on traffic, is more like a puppet that has been set aside. The essence of this cross-border discussion of public figures is to "topicalize" flesh-and-blood people.
Dong Yuhui's so-called "Ambition with Death" may be a rebellion against the boundless offense and disturbance of others hidden behind the hot search. This is actually an ethical issueWe have the right to evaluate public figures, but not the right to define others.
Returning everything to common sense and influencing hot searches with thinking is a more important thing than dwelling on Dong Yuhui's emptying Weibo.
Commentator: Li Ming Proofreader: Yang Hefang Editor: Zhao Xiaoxin.