G20 Live Fryer! The United States is "going against the wind" alone, but it has been blocked by its global allies!
Part 1: Recently, the G20 foreign ministers' closed-door meeting was a jaw-dropping scene. The United States, once the global hegemon, was isolated in the G20 because of its opposition to the ceasefire proposal in the Gaza Strip at the UN Security Council, and was even fiercely criticized by its allies. Seeing that the aura of the former "US imperialism" was dimmed, it was ruthlessly put on a show by the allies.
This is truly unprecedented, the G20 is obviously an arena for economic cooperation, but because of the new escalation of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, this economic forum has become the center of political storms. In this storm, the United States is no longer the master, but has become the target of public criticism, and even its "close allies" have launched fierce verbal and written attacks on it.
At the G20 foreign ministers' closed-door meeting on February 21-22, the United States actually voted against it in the Security Council, which directly attracted a wave of strong criticism. Washington may have thought that its position would sweep everything, but it did not expect that it would fall into isolation and collapse its global standing in an instant. On this occasion, even Britain, a "hardcore ally" of the United States, did not follow in the footsteps of the United States and even abstained. Isn't this abstention a silent reproach to the United States?
At this time, France, Japan, South Korea, Slovenia and other allies voted in favor one after another, directly standing on the opposite side of the United States. The EU has directly criticized Israel's military action and expressed dissatisfaction with the US veto of the ceasefire draft. Australia not only supports an immediate ceasefire, but also issues a strong warning about possible Israeli military action in Rafah. Lula, Brazil, even directly said that "the Gaza conflict is like the Jews during World War II" and Israel are mired in a diplomatic dispute. In this diplomatic storm, the United States actually only showed Argentina to be more "alternative", all because of the clear statement of support for Israel by its new ** Milley.
Netizens also commented one after another, and some lamented the "fall from grace" of the United States: "It seems that the world is no longer a unipolar era, and the United States is now a little capricious." Someone else jokingly said: "Will the 'close allies' of the United States change in the future?" For a time, the isolation of the United States on social ** became a hot topic.
Part 2: Actually, all this change is not accidental. The isolation of the United States in the international arena has long been not just a matter of its position on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Globally, especially in international organizations such as the United Nations, the hegemony of the United States has always been questioned. What was once an "international policeman" is increasingly being questioned about its true intentions and actions.
The Palestinian-Israeli conflict is just a fuse. The United States has been dominant in the Middle East, but it now appears that its hardline stance no longer enjoys global support. Countries are beginning to look at problems more rationally and no longer blindly follow the United States. This also makes it inevitable that the United States will be isolated in the G20.
China, on the other hand, has been relatively low-key in this storm. China has always advocated peaceful settlement and is committed to regional stability and cooperation. Unlike the United States, China's diplomatic stance is more focused on maintaining regional peace than on its own hegemony. China has become a voice of reason and a participant expected by the international community.
Overall, America's isolation in the G20 is not an isolated case, but a legitimate response of the international community to its actions. It is also an opportunity for the rest of the world to reflect on the need to re-examine the international order, abandon unipolar thinking, and work together to build a peaceful and just world. This may be a ray of hope and the expectation of the international community.
Hmph!This scene is really unbelievable, how can the United States "like" a person to stand in line at the G20 foreign ministers' closed-door meeting?The United States is the only country that opposes an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, and it is simply a fighter in the anomaly!In other words, the Palestinian-Israeli issue is so sensitive, and the whole world is calling for a ceasefire, why is the United States "going against the sky"?
At this G20 "dinner", Britain and other allies actually abstained, as if the representatives of the countries present patted their heads and said: "Oh, I'm sorry, we'll let this issue go first." "This is a slap in the face of the United States!The UK is your "hardcore ally", and they didn't vote against you, isn't this a clear sign that they don't buy your account?
What's more, France, Japan, and South Korea actually voted in favor of singing and singing in harmony, directly standing on the side of opposing the United States. It is really a big drama of "anti-collusion" on the Palestinian-Israeli issue, and the United States has become a lonely hero in the "one-man show", so it is no wonder that the outside world is talking about it.
The EU guys even shouted directly at Israel: "Your military operation in Gaza is not authentic!""And the United States went so far as to say no to the ceasefire, which made the European Union extremely dissatisfied. This is a big surprise to eat the "big pot of rice" of the United States, and dare to ignore the overall situation.
Hey, at this time, Australia, an Asia-Pacific ally, stood up and said: Don't make any more trouble, it's not good to offend others, Israel, be careful! Well, I feel that Australia really wants to protect international peace.
However, the most unusual thing is still that Argentina, ** Milley, what's wrong? He actually performed so clearly at the G20 foreign ministers' meeting, with a posture of "supporting Israel". Is this a suspension of one's own country's position? Alas, by doing so, you may lose your impression in the international community.
In short, the United States has really made a lot of trouble this time, and it seems that it has become the "clown" who is not welcomed in the world. The isolation of the Palestinian-Israeli issue is not only a cold bystander on the part of the allies, but also the beginning of a loss of international prestige. Perhaps, those countries that once trusted the United States are beginning to reconsider their choices, after all, in the family of nations, some people are happy and some are worried, and not everyone can do whatever they want.
Alas, watching such a farce cannot help but make people have deep doubts about the international status of the United States. In this era of multipolarity, we can't do things too "out of the box", otherwise we will only become more and more isolated. It is hoped that the United States will reflect on itself, put itself in a correct position, and stop engaging in "solo flight" in international affairs. Otherwise, it's not good to be alone.
The second half of the output article is complete.