Original title: Analysis report on the production scale and construction prospect of the global tight gas industry 2024-2031.
Search the original title to view the full article.
Docking personnel": [Zhou Wenwen].
Last revision date: [January 2024].
Report format: text + electronic version + CD-ROM].
Service content: Provide data research and analysis + update services
Table of Contents of Charts. Figure 1: Distribution of unconventional natural gas resources and major types in China (unit: %)
Chart 2: Policy analysis related to the tight gas industry.
Figure 3: China's GDP and its growth from 2017 to 2024 (unit: 100 million yuan, %)
Figure 4: National industrial added value and its growth from 2017 to 2024 (unit: 100 million yuan, %)
Figure 5: Changes in the number of patent applications related to China's tight gas industry from 2017 to 2024 (unit: items).
Figure 6: Changes in the number of patent disclosures related to China's tight gas industry from 2017 to 2024 (unit: items).
Figure 7: Composition of patent applicants in China's tight gas industry (unit: items).
Figure 8: Comprehensive comparison of technology-related patent applicants in the tight gas industry (unit: item, person, year, %)
Figure 9: Distribution of relevant public patents in China's tight gas industry (unit: items).
Figure 10: Tight gas reserves evaluation process.
Figure 11: China's tight gas reserves from 2017 to 2024 (unit: trillion cubic meters).
Figure 12: Regional distribution of tight gas reserves in China (unit: %)
Figure 13: China's natural gas production and growth from 2017 to 2024 (unit: 100 million cubic meters, %)
Figure 14: Distribution of China's natural gas production structure (unit: %)
Figure 15: China's tight gas production scale from 2017 to 2024 (unit: 100 million cubic meters).
Figure 16: Distribution of tight gas production in China (unit: %)
Figure 17: Growth of China's proven tight gas reserves from 2024 to 2031** (unit: 108m3).
Figure 18: China's tight gas production growth from 2024 to 2031** (unit: 108m3).
Figure 19: China's tight gas production capacity growth, 2024-2031 (unit: 108m3).
Figure 20: Schematic diagram of the rapid drilling process.
Figure 21: 7-layer plot of 8-segment Poisson's ratio profile of the pre-stack inversion of the 05KF6178 survey line.
Figure 22: Plot of the calculation of water saturation versus closed coring water saturation.
Figure 23: Comparison of horizontal well segmentation transformation technologies at home and abroad.
Figure 24: Exhaust gas production calculation parameters (unit: 103m3, %, 10,000 yuan, 104m3 d, year).
Chart 25: Guaranteed production at different gas prices (unit: RMB m3, 104m3).
Figure 26: Relationship between gas price and guaranteed production per well.
Figure 27: Comparison of the guaranteed production of gas wells under different investment conditions (unit: yuan m3, 10,000 yuan wells).
Exhibit 28: Relationship between gas well investment and capital guaranteed production.
Exhibit 29: Distribution of operating costs and gas production.
Figure 30: Classification of tectonic units and distribution of gas fields in the Ordos Basin.
Figure 31: Profile of gas reservoirs from well Su20-16-13 to Su20-16-22 in Sulige Gas Field.
Figure 32: Proven reserves of tight gas in the Ordos Basin from 2017 to 2024 (unit: trillion cubic meters).
Figure 33: Natural gas production from the Sulige gas field from 2017 to 2024 (unit: 108m3).
Figure 34: Changes in well pressure and production in the middle area of Sulige gas field (unit: MPA, 104m3).
Figure 35: Core technology of tight gas development in the Ordos Basin.
Figure 36: Innovative management model of tight gas development in the Ordos Basin.
Figure 37: 2017-2024 Changqing Oilfield tight gas production and** (unit: 108m3).
Figure 38: Distribution of gas source rocks and reservoirs in the Xujiahe Formation in the Sichuan Basin.
Figure 39: Characteristics of gas reservoirs in the Xujiahe Formation in central Sichuan, Sichuan Basin (unit: km2, m, %)
Figure 40: Xujiahe Formation.
Statistical table of gas outlet of the first, third and fifth sections (unit: 104m3 d).
Figure 41: Key potential area of tight gas in the Xujiahe Formation.
Figure 42: Tight sandstone gas resources in Tuha Basin (unit: 104km2, 1012m3).
Figure 43: Tight sandstone gas resources in Songliao Basin (unit: 104km2, 1012m3).
Figure 44: Tight sandstone gas resources in Bohai Bay (unit: 104km2, 1012m3).
Figure 45: Tight sandstone gas resources in Junggar Basin (unit: 104km2, 1012m3).
Exhibit 46: Shell China E&P Basic Information Table.
Exhibit 47: Analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of Shell China's E&P operations.
Exhibit 48: Basic information table of PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development.
Figure 49: Some of the main featured technologies of PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development.
Figure 50: Analysis of the operating advantages and disadvantages of PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development.
Exhibit 51: Basic information table of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Branch.
Chart 52: Analysis of the main economic indicators of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Branch from 2017 to 2024 (unit: 10,000 yuan).
Exhibit 53: Profitability analysis of PetroChina*** Changqing Oilfield Branch, 2017-2024 (unit: %)
Chart 54: Analysis of the operating capacity of PetroChina*** Changqing Oilfield Branch from 2017 to 2024 (unit: times).
Chart 55: Analysis of the solvency of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Branch from 2017 to 2024 (unit: %, times).
Exhibit 56: Analysis of the development capacity of PetroChina*** Changqing Oilfield Branch, 2017-2024 (unit: %)
Exhibit 57: Analysis of the operating advantages and disadvantages of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Branch.
Exhibit 58: Basic information table of Sichuan Deyang Xinchang Gas Field Development Co., Ltd.
Figure 59: Analysis of main economic indicators of Sichuan Deyang Xinchang Gas Field Development Co., Ltd. from 2017 to 2024 (unit: 10,000 yuan).
Exhibit 60: Profitability analysis of Sichuan Deyang Xinchang Gas Field Development Co., Ltd. from 2017 to 2024 (unit: %)
Figure 61: Analysis of the operational capacity of Sichuan Deyang Xinchang Gas Field Development Co., Ltd. from 2017 to 2024 (unit: times).
Figure 62: Analysis of the solvency of Sichuan Deyang Xinchang Gas Field Development Co., Ltd. from 2017 to 2024 (unit: %, times).
Figure 63: Analysis of the development capacity of Sichuan Deyang Xinchang Gas Field Development Co., Ltd. from 2017 to 2024 (unit: %)
Figure 64: Analysis of the operating advantages and disadvantages of Sichuan Deyang Xinchang Gas Field Development Co., Ltd.
Figure 65: Basic information table of the second gas production plant of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Branch.
Exhibit 66: Major exploration and development performance of the second gas production plant of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company.
Figure 67: Natural gas production from the second gas production plant of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company from 2017 to 2024 (unit: 100 million cubic meters per year).
Figure 68: Analysis of the operating advantages and disadvantages of the second gas production plant of PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company.
Exhibit 69: Basic information table of China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation *** North China Branch.
Chart 70: Analysis of the operating advantages and disadvantages of China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation North China Branch.
Exhibit 71: Basic information table of PetroChina *** Southwest Oil & Gas Field Branch.
Exhibit 72: Analysis of the operating advantages and disadvantages of PetroChina*** Southwest Oil and Gas Field Branch.
Figure 73: Regional distribution of global tight gas resources (unit: 108t).
Figure 74: Schematic map of tight sandstone-bearing gas basins in the United States.
Exhibit 75: U.S. natural gas production structure in trillion cubic feet, 2024-2031
Exhibit 76: Distribution of natural gas in Canada (in %)
Exhibit 77: Comparison of three types of unconventional natural gas reserves.
Figure 78: Comparison of three unconventional natural gas exploration and development technologies.
Exhibit 79: Comparison of the support of three types of unconventional natural gas policies.
Figure 80: Proportion of three types of unconventional natural gas production (in %)
Figure 81: China's natural gas production development scenario from 2024 to 2031 (unit: 100 million m3, %)