Wang Wei, a member of the Faculty of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and a researcher at the Institute of Archaeology of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said that the excavation of Sanxingdui, especially the new round of excavations, should be a model for Chinese archaeology in the new era. Multidisciplinary combination, more than 40 teams, cross-departmental, cross-system, not only Sichuan's team and technology, as long as it can be used, are invested in excavation, including logistics support, achievement transformation and dissemination, etc., all represent the latest concept and level of Chinese archaeology. If you want to understand contemporary Chinese archaeology, you have to look at Sanxingdui. In order to study the origin of Chinese civilization and the process of its formation and development, it is necessary to study the pattern of pluralism and integration. The civilization of each region has its own characteristics, Sanxingdui is a very characteristic regional civilization in the Xia and Shang periods, it is closely related to the Central Plains, including metallurgical technology, jade ritual vessels, and bronze ritual vessels are all influenced by the Xia and Shang dynasties. At the same time, he integrated his own characteristics into this metallurgy and exerted it to the extreme, so he cast as exquisite utensils as the sacred tree and the bronze Daliren. Therefore, I think it is a very good example of the pluralistic and integrated pattern of Chinese civilization.
Researcher Wang Wei has two meanings: 1. Sanxingdui bears the responsibility of the times to become a model of Chinese archaeology in the new era;2 Sanxingdui's various technologies are all influenced by the Xia Shang, and the technology is from the Central Plains and has local cultural characteristics. Combined with the statement of researcher Tang Fei, president of the Sichuan Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology and now promoted to director of the Sichuan Cultural Relics Bureau, some time ago, Sanxingdui has existing archaeological discoveries, as well as the preliminary results of several pit excavations, it can be determined that the academic community's understanding and positioning of Sanxingdui is probably so. The simple feelings of the people and "I don't agree, I don't agree" will inevitably die down with the passage of time, and in various unequal circumstances, the people's ardent expectations will eventually become a problem if they are not responded to and explained, which is not good or good
Is the positioning and understanding of Sanxingdui accurate in the academic and archaeological circles?In fact, there is still some truth, but it is not accurate, the reason why I say this is because the academic community makes such a judgment on the basis of the only traditional documents and existing archaeological data, whether it is literature or archaeology, they are all in a bulk state and are not systematic. There is a serious lack of information and many cognitive gaps, and it should be reasonable to make a judgment that is "not accurate" in this case. So what kind of determination is reasonable?By filling in the missing information and connecting the missing links, we have no reason to doubt that history is logical. Then the Sanxingdui is completely presented, the method of testing the presentation effect is very simple, as long as you have received nine years of compulsory education, you can understand it, and you don't need too many interfering explanations, which is reasonable.
We can overestimate the imagination and creativity of Sanxingdui people, but we should not underestimate the existing achievements of the evolution of human civilization and doubt the basic logic of historical development. The reason why history is complicated is just the various misunderstandings of the ancient wise men in unclear situations, and then to deviate, as long as you find the right direction and use the right method, in fact, history is not complicated, but the complex is whether you are willing, daring or not, just like we have been distinguishing the "Bamboo Book Chronicle" is false, and do not deny that "Tsinghua Jane" is true, the problem is not true or false at all.