The people are in danger of being opposed to the law
Recently, there has been a trend of thought on the Internet, and some people have publicly disseminated some views that violate national laws on their own platforms, trying to artificially provoke conflicts between the people and national laws and create contradictions.
Since the first law of the People's Republic of China in 1954, the status and role of the people in the national constitution have remained unchanged, although the constitution has undergone five revisions.
Article 1 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China stipulates that the People's Republic of China is a people's democratic socialist country led by the working class and based on the alliance of workers and peasants.
Article 2 of the Constitution clearly stipulates that all power in the People's Republic of China belongs to the people. In accordance with the provisions of the law, the people manage state affairs, economic and cultural undertakings, and social affairs through various channels and forms.
As the foundation of the state, the Constitution is the basis for the enactment of all other laws, so it is also called the "mother law". The enactment of the Constitution reflects the will of the ruling class of the People's Republic of China as a society in which the people are the masters of the country.
At the same time, all the laws of the People's Republic of China also reflect the will of the people. These laws, enacted and endorsed by the State, specify the rights and duties of the people, and are guaranteed to be enforced by the coercive power of the State and are universally binding.
Law has been an integral part of society since the emergence of classes. However, in Chinese history, the law has represented the interests of the ruling class, not the people.
Only in New China does the Constitution clearly stipulate the status and role of the people in state law, reflecting the will and interests of the people. This marks a real change and progress in China's legal system.
Original text: New China is a socialist country, and the fundamental difference between a socialist country and a feudal country and a capitalist country lies in the question of whose interests it represents.
The socialist state represents the interests of the broadest masses of the people, while the feudal and capitalist countries represent only the interests of a small number of ruling and exploiting classes.
The laws of a socialist country are a concentrated expression of the will of the people and reflect the interests of the broadest masses of the people. The Constitution of the People's Republic of China clearly embodies the unity of the interests of the people and the state, the people are the masters of the country, and the state is the carrier of the people's interests.
National laws are important for safeguarding the interests of the people. For example, the law of China's feudal society has a provision that "the punishment cannot be punished by a doctor", and the law of New China stipulates that "everyone is equal before the law", which is essentially different.
Therefore, nothing can be separated or opposed in any way between the people and the state, and between the people and the laws of the state. Separating or pitting the people from the laws of the country is an ulterior motive, and we must be highly vigilant.
Recently, such a red flag has emerged on online platforms. Some people use the self-leading platform to deliberately create contradictions and disturb people's minds. Some people questioned the people's question of the loss of state-owned assets on the online platform, "those who represent the interests of the people call it "regard the national law as something that can be trampled on casually", and said wildly that "in their eyes, for the interests of the people, for the interests of the majority of the people, they can ignore any law." ”
This kind of remarks is, first of all, to set the masses of the people against the laws of the state. We can't help but ask, even if it is not said to be "representing the interests of the people", can the people question the issue of the loss of state-owned assets?
Everyone also knows that the national law will crack down on violations of law and discipline, and the masses of the people do not disbelieve that the state law will condone all illegal and criminal acts, but as the masses of the people question the problem of the loss of state-owned assets, the starting point is also for the interests of the country and the interests of the people.
How can a question become a "casual trampling" on the laws of the country? The interests of the masses of the people, the interests of the majority of the people, and the interests of the state are inherently identical, so why should the masses of the people be concerned about the interests of the state?
Many netizens on the Internet questioned the loss of state-owned assets, which did not conflict with national laws, but precisely reflected the people's high concern for national interests.
Their use of online platforms to speak out is a legitimate expression of the people's public opinion and a concrete manifestation of the people's concern for national interests. This is also the basic right granted to the people by the Constitution.
Article 2 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China clearly stipulates: "All power in the People's Republic of China belongs to the people. In accordance with the provisions of the law, the people manage state affairs, economic and cultural undertakings, and social affairs through various channels and forms. ”
This is the basic right granted by law to every Chinese citizen. On the Internet, the people's doubts about the loss of state-owned assets are precisely their active participation in the management of state affairs, economic, cultural, and social affairs, and are a concrete manifestation of people's democracy.
And in the eyes of some people, how can it become "trampling" on the laws of the country? This is clearly a manifestation of pitting the people against the laws of the country. Let's talk about private enterprises.
The state law stipulates that the socialist economy should adhere to the common development of various economic components with the state-owned economy as the main body. It is the consensus of the people that the state encourages and protects the private economy.
However, the state has also made explicit regulations on the disorderly expansion of some capital and some capital monopoly behaviors, and the people criticize the bad behavior of some capital, how can it become the people's shouting and shouting of "private capital"?
According to this logic, the country's development of the private economy is to allow capital to behave in a disorderly manner? What is more, such people also denounce the people's nostalgia for the first 30 years as "from their nostalgia for the era of their lawlessness, and the fact that they have always called that era of imperfect laws "the age of burning passion", we can know that what they actually miss is to do whatever they want without legal constraints. ”