The research performance evaluation index system of many universities has become extremely complex, including not only the quantity and quality of scientific research results, but also teaching, science and technology promotion, policy recommendations and other aspects. As a result, teachers need to spend a lot of energy and time to perform other tasks in addition to scientific research, resulting in insufficient time for scientific research and it is difficult to concentrate on in-depth research. For teachers who love research and have the ability to think deeply, this situation bothers and disagrees.
In addition, the sheer number of indicators puts pressure on teachers. Each indicator requires a certain amount of time and effort to complete, and the requirements of multiple indicators need to be taken into account, which is a great challenge for teachers' workload. As a result, faculty members question whether this cumbersome performance appraisal system can really accurately assess research performance.
The current research performance appraisal system often focuses too much on quantity and ignores the quality and impact of scientific research results. Teachers have found that as long as they publish a considerable number of **, they can get better evaluation of scientific research performance. As a result, some faculty members have a large number of scientific research outputs, but the actual value of these results is difficult to measure and assess.
In addition, the performance evaluation system has the problem of paying too much attention to awards and honors. Receiving research awards and honors does enhance the reputation and status of teachers, but these awards do not necessarily accurately reflect the quality and scholarship of research output. In order to pursue awards and honors, some teachers may focus too much on award application and evaluation, and ignore real scientific innovation.
The research performance evaluation methods of many universities are too mechanical, focusing only on quantitative statistics, and lacking in-depth evaluation and understanding of scientific research results. This kind of evaluation method can easily cause teachers' creative thinking and exploration spirit in the process of scientific research to be suppressed, and even lead teachers to deliberately pursue some quantifiable results, while ignoring the essence of scientific research and academic value.
In addition, the mechanization of evaluation methods can also lead to competition and comparison among teachers. Due to the openness and transparency of evaluation indicators, teachers often use research performance as a means of competition and compete for more research results and awards. This competitive environment can easily lead to the utilitarianization of scientific research work, and weaken the creative motivation and teamwork spirit of teachers.
Many teachers believe that there are problems of authority and impartiality in the evaluation results of scientific research performance. The composition of the evaluation committee and the evaluation criteria are often not transparent enough, which can easily lead to teachers' doubts and dissatisfaction with the evaluation results. In addition, the release of some evaluation results also lacks scientificity and objectivity, resulting in the failure of teachers to be fairly recognized and rewarded for their efforts and efforts. This situation has virtually weakened the enthusiasm and enthusiasm of teachers, and has a negative impact on scientific research.
In the current evaluation of scientific research performance, although the relevant departments have worked hard to overcome the problem of "five only", there are still many controversies and troubles. The evaluation indicators are too cumbersome, too superficial, too mechanical, and the authority and fairness of the evaluation results, which make teachers have a lot of criticisms about the evaluation of scientific research performance. In order to solve these problems, it is necessary for the education department to further optimize the evaluation index system, improve the scientificity and flexibility of evaluation methods, and strengthen the fairness and authority of evaluation results, so as to promote the healthy development of scientific research and the enthusiasm of teachers in scientific research.
Citations: