U.S. policy in the Middle East is highly controversial, and recent military operations have aroused resentment in several Arab countries and armed groups. However, the United States has only paid lip service to these issues and has not taken actual action. This raises questions about whether the United States is still the "world hegemon". Recently, a U.S. military base in northeastern Jordan was hit by suicide drones, killing 37 U.S. soldiers. US intelligence believes that the attack was planned by Iran. However, the United States did not respond substantively to this. On the contrary, the United States has also made a number of moves that have attracted attention. First, the United States welcomed its first female Chief of Naval Operations. This is a historic moment, and it also shows the importance that the United States attaches to and reforms the military. The woman will face significant challenges and will need to excel in a male-dominated field. Secondly, a large number of US troops flew to the Middle East and Europe.
This move hints at the U.S. attitude toward the Middle East and the importance it attaches to regional stability. However, does this mean that the United States is still the "world hegemon"? U.S. policy in the Middle East has been questioned. Over the past few decades, the United States has been intervening in the region, trying to shape its own interests and influence. However, this approach did not achieve lasting success, but instead provoked more opposition. In recent military operations, the United States has been resented by a number of Arab countries and armed groups. These countries and organizations believe that the actions of the United States are a violation of their sovereignty and security. However, the United States has only paid lip service to these accusations and has not taken actual action. This raises questions about whether the United States is still the "world hegemon". As one of the most powerful countries in the world, the United States has great economic and military power. However, the United States has shown hesitation when confronted with the problems of the Middle East.
At the same time, other countries are on the rise. China's rapid economic and military development has made it a worldwide competitor. Russia, on the other hand, has an expanding influence in the Middle East and maintains close cooperative relations with Iran and other countries. In the face of the rise of these emerging powers, will the position of the United States remain unchanged? This is a question to ponder. In the era of globalization, no single country can dominate the world on its own. On the contrary, international cooperation and multilateralism are the key to solving the problem. Therefore, the United States needs to re-examine its Middle East policy. Peace and stability in the region can be achieved only through cooperation and dialogue with other countries. Otherwise, it will be difficult for the United States to maintain its status as a "world hegemon". In short, the United States has only paid lip service to the problems of the Middle East and has not taken real action. This exposes the true attitude of the United States and makes people question whether it is still the "world hegemon".
Losing control of the Middle East could lead to the collapse of US hegemony. Moreover, stability and peace in the Middle East region have a direct impact on Israel's security. In order to regain control of the Middle East and protect Israel, the United States may take more aggressive actions and even start a major war in the Middle East. So, who will the United States treat as the first "enemy"? This is a matter of concern. The United States has seen Iran as a major threat to the Middle East in the past, and has even imposed a series of sanctions in an attempt to curb Iran's influence. Recently, however, the United States withdrew its support for the Iran nuclear deal and announced the reimposition of sanctions against Iran. This move may signal that the United States will take more aggressive action against Iran. In addition to Iran, there are a number of other factors that could also be the trigger for US military action in the Middle East. For example, the civil war in Syria has been going on for years, and the United States has intervened in the region and supported the best forces.
However, at the same time, Russia has also established military bases in Syria and provided assistance to the ** army. This further complicates the situation in the Middle East and increases tensions between the United States and Russia. If Syria were to be targeted by the United States for military action in the Middle East, it would create greater uncertainty for the entire region. In addition, there are some observers who believe that the United States may target Iraq as its next target. The Iraq War was one of the most controversial U.S. actions in the Middle East and one of the causes of instability in the region. If the United States takes military action against Iraq again, it will trigger a larger regional conflict and may lead to greater instability in the Middle East. Regardless of who the United States chooses to treat as its first "enemy," we cannot ignore the complexity and diversity of the Middle East. This involves the interweaving and collision of different countries, different sects, and different interests.
Military action by either side could trigger a chain reaction that could lead to greater conflict and chaos. Therefore, we must be vigilant and seek ways to resolve the issue peacefully. The situation in the Middle East is a global concern, as it is not only about regional stability and peace, but also about the global economic and political landscape. We hope that the United States will exercise caution and do its utmost to avoid excessive military action. At the same time, all countries in the Middle East should remain calm and restrained, resolve differences through dialogue and consultation, and jointly safeguard regional peace and security. Only in this way can we bring a better future to the Middle East.