Successfully defended his title in QatarAsian CupofCriticalIn the battle, the refereeManinThree penalties were awardedPenalties, and all were awarded to Qatar. This penalty has caused some controversy, but in the evaluation of ** people and experts,ManinThe law enforcement was unanimously praised.
The firstPenaltiesThe decision occurred in the 20th minute of the game, when Qatari player Afif was tripped by an opponent for a foul in the boxManinPenalties were awarded without hesitationPenalties。The decision was recognized by a wide audience and **, because it was an undisputed decision in the case of a clear foul.
The secondPenaltiesThe decision took place in the 69th minute of the match, when the Qatari player was thereAliKnocked down by opposing player Maldi in the box. ManinWith the assistance of the assistant referee, a slow-motion replay was played to confirm the decisionPenalties。This time the penalty also caused some controversy, but with the assistance of the refereeManinThe decision is considered accurate.
The thirdPenaltiesThe decision came in the 90th minute of the game, when Qatar's Afif was again beaten by Jordan in the boxGoalkeeperKnocked down. The decision also caused some controversy, but in the refereeFu Mingwith the assistance of the peopleManinAgain, a slow-motion replay was played and a third penalty was madePenaltiesdecision. Despite three penalties in a rowPenaltiesManinThe decision is still not too controversial.
The famous ** person Lu Yang is rightManinThe penalty was evaluated, and he thinks that threePenaltiesThe penalties were correct, especially the last twoPenaltiesThe decision was made at the prompting of the referee. Lu Yang also pointed out that although Jordan is inAsian Cupbut losing in such a way is definitely frustrating.
Another expert, Wang Jisheng, is also rightManinThe penalty was affirmed and he thought of the threePenaltiesThere was nothing wrong with the decision. He also mentioned that Jordan** may be unhappy with the result of this loss, but in light ofManin's accurate judgment, South Korea's ** should be fairly evaluated.
Xu Zexin is also rightManin, he said that despite three consecutive penaltiesPenaltiesIt is relatively rare in continental competitions, howeverManinThe decision was accurate and there were no mistakes.
Zhang LuRightManinThe law enforcement was highly rated, he believesManinThe law enforcement is flawless and there are no flaws. At the same time,Zhang LuHe also praised the performance of the assistant referee team, who he believes are very accurate in the replays.
EvaluationManinLaw enforcementZhan JuninAsian CupwithFu Mingof law enforcement are all outstanding. And he guessed that the futureManinwithFu MingThere may be opportunities to participate in the enforcement of the America's Cup.
ManinIn Qatar with JordanAsian CupThree penalties were awarded in the finalPenalties, a decision that sparked mixed voices and controversy.
First of all,ManinThree penalties imposedPenalties, there are certain controversies and doubts. Some viewers and ** thinkManinThe penalty was biased in favour of Qatar. Especially the second and thirdPenaltiesThe decision was made with the intervention of the assistant referee. This decision is seen by someManinIntentional favoritism towards Qatar.
Secondly, thoughManinThe sentence sparked controversy, but there were also some who recognized and appreciated his law enforcement. They thinkManinThe decision in this game was accurate and there were no mistakes. Especially for the first twoPenaltiesMost people believe that these decisions are uncontroversial.
Finally, this controversy has also raised concerns aboutvar(**Assistant Referee) system. Some people thinkvarcan improve the accuracy of penalties and prevent incorrect penalties from occurring. However, there are also those who believevarThe introduction of the game could spark more controversy and interfere with the conduct of the game.
In summary,ManinIn Qatar with JordanAsian CupThree penalties were awarded in the finalPenalties, sparking different voices and controversy. Despite the controversy, there are also many who recognize and appreciate his law enforcement, believing that his sentence was accurate.
ManinIn Qatar with JordanAsian CupThree consecutive penalties were awarded in the finalPenalties, a decision that sparked widespread controversy. However, I thinkManinThe penalty was accurate, he was judgingPenaltiesNo errors or subjective biases have occurred. While controversy is inevitable, it's alsoFootballA common situation in the game.
Regarding the controversy over this decision, I think it is important to distinguish between personal subjective opinions and objective facts. The accuracy of a penalty should be based on the rules and the actual situation of the game, not on personal preference or bias. ManinAs a professional referee, his decisions should be objective, fair and accurate.
In addition,varThe introduction of the system has also had an important impact on the enforcement of referees. varThe purpose of the system is to improve the accuracy of match penalties and reduce the occurrence of wrong decisions. However, it is not a panacea, and it still requires the correct use and judgment of the referee. ForManinThis time, three penalties were imposedPenaltiesof the penalty,varThe intervention ensures the objectivity and accuracy of the decision.
In general,ManinIn Qatar with JordanAsian CupThe enforcement performance in the final was flawless, and his decision was accurate. Controversy and doubts are inevitable, but we should evaluate his decision objectively and judge it based on the rules and the actual situation of the game. FootballThe game requires the fairness and accuracy of the referee, as well as the understanding and respect of the audience and the referee.