Last night, I had a family gathering with 4 good friends, 4 families of children, of the same age, 2 in China, studying science, one in the United States, and one in the United Kingdom who had just graduated from a graduate school in liberal arts.
They discussed whether they could use ChatGPT, and the domestic ones could not open ChatGPT, so they could only use other high-quality imitations. Both foreign countries can be used, and the American ones have bought their own accounts, and the professor is encouraged to use them. The guidelines are that students can use ChatGPT to help with assignments, but they are not allowed to consult it during exams.
Talking about the benefits of CHAPGPT, children in the United States shared: You can ask any questions at any time, and you will have relevant information and feedback right away, without relying on a mentor or peer. This is especially helpful for students with limited resources, facing barriers to education, or in need of additional support.
Then there is engagement, for students who prefer a conversational teaching model, ChatGPT can make learning more interactive and engaging; ChatGPT can also help students develop critical thinking and intercultural skills by challenging their assumptions and biases.
Then there's innovation: Chat GPT inspires students to explore new ideas, possibilities, and solutions.
Because it's not my own field, it's hard to comment on anything, so let's talk about the legal aspects that I am familiar with.
OpenAI recently released the first SORA model that uses text to generate**, and users input text descriptions to generate a high-definition smooth** segment that is up to 1 minute long. Many big Vs in the field of science and technology lamented that this product has seen that the gap between Chinese and American AI technology has further widened.
I myself have been involved in intellectual property disputes in the United States, and I would like to talk about my own understanding of American legislation.
The U.S. issued an executive order last November to drive AI development and deployment through leadership from federal agencies, industry regulation, and collaboration with international partners. *Unlike legislation, executive orders do not require congressional approval, and in the event of an emergency, they can be issued immediately and effectively enforced. Avoid relevant policies being stuck and delayed in Congress.
The Executive Order includes more than 100 specific actions to be taken by more than 50 federal entities to implement guidance in eight overarching policy areas.
One is that the United States will become a global leader in the development and adoption of artificial intelligence.
2. How? Grab people, throw money at them, and keep these highly skilled immigrant workers with critical expertise in the United States.
It is very straightforward to mention that not only come to the United States to study, but also stay. Currently, there are about 900,000 international students in the United States, nearly half of whom are enrolled in STEM fields. It's the acronym for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. This policy change is likely to affect about 450,000 international students, three in ten from China and two in ten from India.
Last night, I kept thinking, in this case, how can we deal with it effectively?