Many people think: once Trump is elected to the United States, Zelensky and his Ukraine will be unlucky.
Why?
Because: First, Trump is a narrow American supremacy, he doesn't like to meddle with other people's affairs, and he doesn't like to use American money to support Ukraine. Second, Trump is not interested in an organization like NATO, and he has threatened to dissolve NATO, so it is unlikely that he will cooperate with NATO to protect Ukraine. 3. Trump wants to develop relations with Putin.
These three arguments look fine! Flawless! So, let's evaluate these three arguments.
Let's take a look at the first:
It can be seen from what Trump did during his tenure as the United States that Trump's personality is very American - he is particularly fond of showmanship. However, as an American**, he behaved a bit of the "Monroe Doctrine" - he was not very willing to take care of things that did not belong to the United States. During the overall period of the first election campaign, Trump threatened to withdraw from the TPP, threatened to withdraw from the dissolution of NATO, and threatened to ask Japan and other countries to pay "protection money" ......Wait, in short, he's going to get the United States to dissolve the cottage he set up - he's going to quit the group! It is precisely because Trump is a "personal hero" that in addition to the "establishment" in the United States such as Pelosi, the "establishment" leaders of European countries such as Theresa May and Japan such as ** Shinzo do not like him.
In short, we can see that Trump seems to be diametrically opposed to Hollywood's advocacy that the United States should be the world leader and responsible for saving the planet. But the question is: Do the American people agree with him thinking and doing so?
We can think about it, Hollywood's "Superman", "Spider-Man", "Transformers" ......It's all about selling money, and if these films can't cater to American tastes, can they still sell for money? You can only lose money! So: Hollywood's taste is American's. In this way, Trump's desire for the United States to abandon the idea of world leadership is contrary to Americans' desire for the United States to be the master of the world.
"The United States wants to be the leader of the world" - in the United States, Trump has become the leader, if he wants to seek to change this, if he wants to abandon Europe, if he wants to abandon Japan, Australia, South Korea, .....Then he is absolutely self-inflicted, and he cannot live.
But fortunately, Trump has learned a lesson, during the last ** term, he even withdrew from the TPP, but in the end, he did not dare to withdraw from NATO, and he did not dare to blatantly abandon the little minions of the United States in Asia. Originally, the tough guy Trump was a person who really wanted outsiders to think that he was a man who kept his promises! Hehe! But on the issue of withdrawing from NATO and abandoning his partners, he finally broke his promise and backed down. Why? Because he finally learned the wisdom of the Chinese: self-inflicted, do not live!
It is certain that after Trump took office, he learned the lessons of the last time, he will not dissolve NATO, he will continue to maintain and develop the relationship between the United States and Europe, and now, the core interest of Europe is Ukraine, and Europe will firmly believe that if Trump gives up Ukraine, it is equivalent to giving up Europe. Therefore, if the United States gives up on Ukraine, there will be little point in Europe dealing with Trump. Then Europe will not hesitate to cut off relations with Trump, and if so, Trump will not be able to answer to the American people.
Let's look at the second one
The relationship between Trump and Putin is indeed ambiguous. The well-known reason is that the Trump family has a certain scale of business operations in Russia, and his family's business in Russia has always been run by his favorite daughter and daughter's son-in-law, Kushner. In short, Trump's relationship with Russia is a bit unclear.
During Trump's tenure, he said that he wanted to develop relations with Russia, and he also said that he would invite the emperor to visit the United States. The Emperor probably never imagined that the world would change so quickly, and that happiness would come so suddenly, so he sat in the Kremlin and waited happily for an invitation from the White House.
Who knows, this invitation did not come in the end. Why? Because the U.S. Congress launched a fierce ** against Trump, it didn't even give Trump the time to sit down and write an invitation letter......The emperor probably never thought that the world would change so quickly, and happiness would go even more suddenly.
The last time Trump was **, he was not able to shoot the arrow sent to him by Cupid as he wished, this time, the image of the emperor in the hearts of the American people is about to become a rat running on the street, can Trump still fall in love with the emperor freely? Even on the American mind, Americans will not agree to Trump's abandonment of Ukraine in exchange for a handshake with the aggressor, even because they believe that the eastern powers are posing a threat to the United States and can ease relations with Russia. So, on the contrary, Trump may set a condition for the Emperor: to leave Ukraine.
Isn't that better for Ukraine?
To sum up, the author thinks that even if Trump becomes a **, Zelensky has nothing to worry about. This is not: Zelensky, who has very high emotional intelligence, has confidently thrown an olive branch ....... to Trump
Finally, I want to say: if the Emperor agrees to Trump's request, leaves Ukraine, and succeeds in holding hands with the United States, then the eastern powers .......
The above views are solely those of the authors.