1. India's frequent failures in "normalization", Jaishankar angrily reprimanded the founding leader, and blamed China for not knowing how to repay the favor
India has long aspired to become a permanent member of the United Nations, yet their application has failed time and time again. Recently, Indian Foreign Minister S Jaishankar published a new book in which he criticized India's founding leader, Jawaharlal Nehru, and blamed China for not reciprocating India's "kindness." However, this accusation is really untenable. Jaishankar ignores an important fact: India itself does not qualify for permanent membership. Membership in the UN requires the support of UN member states, and with the five existing permanent members not exercising veto power, India still needs at least 128 votes from its member states to join even if China does not object. Nehru supported China's return to the United Nations because he believed that it would contribute to the maintenance of international peace and security. Jaishankar ignores these facts and puts the blame on China, which is unfair and unjustifiable.
Second, the Maldives is determined to be pro-China, and the situation in South Asia will changeModi was humiliated, India launched a frenzied retaliation, and the Maldives is in danger?
The Maldives recently decided to approach China, a move that could change the situation in South Asia. Maldives' new Moiz said he would be open to China and planned a state visit. This news caused discontent and retaliatory actions in India. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's surprise visit to the Lakshadweep Islands near the Maldives and the release of a tour** were seen as a warning to Maldives' policy. However, the Maldives hit back, not only insulting Modi but also mocking India's capabilities in terms of tourism. India then retaliated by cancelling 2,500 flights to the Maldives and more than 8,000 hotel bookings, and suspending three of the Maldives' deputy ministers. Such a hardline approach would only backfire and hastened the Maldives' resolve to lean more towards China.
India has long wanted to become a permanent member of the United Nations, but its application has been frustrated. However, this cannot be entirely attributed to China's resistance. Becoming a permanent member requires the support of the United Nations member states, and the five existing permanent members cannot exercise the right of veto. Even if China does not object, India will still need to get the support votes of about 128 member states to successfully join. India's application for permanent membership has been slow because it does not qualify for permanent membership of the permanent membership of the National Security Council. Therefore, it is unfounded to blame China for blocking India's accession, and India itself should reflect on why it could not meet the application requirements.
The Maldives has recently changed its closeness to India and is closer to China. This move could have an impact on the situation in South Asia. The new Maldives Moiz said it would open up to China and planned to pay a state visit to China. This decision caused discontent and retaliatory actions from India, which increased tensions with the Maldives. However, the Maldives' choice will not directly change the situation in the entire South Asian region, which still has complex geopolitical issues and conflicting interests. Despite China's growing influence in South Asia, other powers such as India and the United States still have significant influence in the region. Therefore, the change in the situation in South Asia will not be determined solely by the choices of the Maldives.
In short, China cannot be blamed for India's frequent failures in its application for permanent membership, as India itself does not qualify for permanent membership. The choice of a pro-China route in the Maldives may have some kind of impact, but the situation in South Asia is still affected by a variety of factors.