The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been a matter of international concern. In recent conflicts, Israel seems to have ignored the accusations and continued its military campaign against the Palestinians, despite the condemnation it has faced from the United States, Europe, and the world. Countries have criticized Israel's actions, however, due to years of Israeli propaganda that has successfully linked Jews to fascism, some countries have shown hesitation in condemnation. This ideological control has made criticism of Israel seen as contrary to the order and correctness established after the war. This notion is reinforced by the Jewish mastery of capital and **, and while some people have an idea of what the Jews really are, the right restraint makes some countries dare to maintain only superficial condemnation in the midst of conflict, without really taking substantive action.
Despite the international criticism it has received, Israel seems unwavering in the face of these accusations. Behind this apathy may be due to the image that it has successfully built over a long period of time. Through its elaborate propaganda, Israel has succeeded in planting Jewish ties to fascism deep in the hearts and minds of the people. This makes international accusations against Israel appear hesitant and weak. Some countries, while collectively critical of Israel's actions, maintain a semblance of condemnation in the conflict because of the influence of Jews in terms of ** and capital. This contradiction between indifference and condemnation is a complex mix of ideologies and interests in the international community.
Part of the reason why Israel has been able to remain apathetic internationally is because of the enormous influence of Jews in the sphere of ** and capital. For a long time, Jews' control of these two key areas allowed them to dominate the flow of information and information. This control has further strengthened Israel's image and made international condemnation of its actions intimidating. Although some ordinary people have some knowledge of Jewish truth, this right restraint makes it difficult for the state to genuinely express its displeasure with its actions in the face of Israel. ** and the mastery of capital has become an almost unshakable weapon for Israel in international affairs.
Internationally, the concept of correctness makes it difficult to make real criticism of Israel. The historical shadow of ** and big ** of Jews has made people hesitate and fear when it comes to judging Israel's actions. This historical impact has led some countries to remain superficial in their criticisms rather than to take real action. Correctness has become an invisible shackle that limits positive international intervention in Israel's behavior. Thus, while some countries may be unhappy with Israel's actions, they have shown hesitation in taking action.
In the current Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Israel's indifference has been a reflection on international condemnation. Through its control over capital and the influence of history, Israel has managed to maintain relative stability in international affairs. While some countries collectively criticize its actions, correctness and Jewish mastery in key areas make real intervention difficult. This complex and delicate interweaving of international situations, histories and cultures makes conflict resolution difficult.