This paragraph**Everyone should be familiar with it, originally a 29-year-old woman went to the toilet without a paper to call the police, and after the police sent the paper, it caused heated discussions because of criticism and education. The story doesn't end there, and the rest of the story is even more twisty. After being criticized and educated by the police, Liu seemed to be dissatisfied, and went to the hospital to check his injuries and prepare to sue the police. Regarding the follow-up incident of the 29-year-old woman who went to the toilet without a paper, the latest situation is that the woman is still stubborn, insisting that she will sue the police, bluntly saying "I will sue you to the end". Liu also posted the so-called "injury report" issued by himself to the hospital.
At the moment, the incident has become even more confusing. The woman Liu took the medical records issued by the two hospitals she went to on social **, respectively, Wuhan Second Hospital and Wuhan *** hung departments are oral and laryngeal departments, and they are also emergencies. What is puzzling is that the contents of these two diagnoses show that Liu has no obvious symptoms and wounds, but only feels a little pain in his nose. What's even more puzzling is that the medical records posted by Liu show different times, the medical record dates of Wuhan Second Hospital are seven o'clock in the evening on November 17, 2023 and five and a half past five in the afternoon on November 18, 2023, while the medical records of Wuhan *** show the time at 3 pm on January 17, 2024. **The report states that the incident took place on January 26 and that there are contradictions in the timeline.
What's more interesting is that Liu also made public his medical records of rhinitis, arms, and ears last year, and even posted the fee receipts for rabies vaccination, showing that it cost 82 yuan. This kind of behavior is ridiculous, after all, she is already a 29-year-old adult, but she posted such a private medical record on a public platform, which makes people question the logic of her thinking.
Looking back at the whole incident, it is actually quite simple, the cause was a cat scratch, not toilet paper. To summarize the woman's statement, look at the cause and effect of the incident from her point of view: Liu was scratched by a cat and wanted to find compensation from the cat owner. Then, failing to reach an agreement with the cat's owner, she called the police and was beaten up. Liu claimed that he did not go to the case handling area after being beaten, but only went to find a tissue, and then called the police again. From the description of the police, the following points can be known: The incident was caused by Liu being scratched by a cat, and because the negotiation was fruitless, he kept calling the police. Liu claimed that the police beat her, but did not provide evidence, only accusing her of being pushed and feeling pain. Liu called the police when there was no paper in the toilet. A conversation between the police and the police during her education showed that she had made multiple calls to 110, wasting police resources.
Judging from the development of the matter, Liu may be unwilling and feel that he has been treated unfairly. But the medical records and medical records she posted did not provide strong support for her claims. There is a large discrepancy between the time shown on the medical record and the timeline of the event, raising public doubts about her authenticity. Liu's behavior also caused heated discussions among netizens, and some people expressed dissatisfaction with her immaturity and irrationality, thinking that her actions were too naïve.
In this incident, Liu may have made a series of unbelievable behaviors under the impulse of emotions. Her actions not only exposed personal privacy, but also affected public order to a certain extent. The public response to her appeal has also been mixed, with some arguing that she should solve the problem rationally rather than using radical means to attract social attention.
The whole incident reflects the fact that some people may choose to express their dissatisfaction in extreme ways when faced with contradictions and disputes. This behavior does not solve the problem and can lead to more negative effects. When dealing with similar issues, rational, calm, and reasonable communication and consultation are more sensible choices.
As for Liu's appeal to sue the police, the relevant departments need to conduct an investigation and verification to clarify the truth. It also reminds the public to remain calm and rational when solving problems, and to avoid causing unnecessary disputes through radical means. Society needs more rational thinking and an inclusive mindset in order to better cope with various complex situations.
In this incident, the report also played a role in guiding and supervising. Through objective and fair reporting of events, it helps the public to understand the truth more comprehensively and form rational judgments. It is hoped that in the future, all parties in society will be able to deal with similar incidents more rationally and calmly and avoid unnecessary adverse effects.
The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any of the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.