Title: Putin PK Navalny: Russia survives, who do you pick?
The flames of war in Russia are raging, and the two heroes Putin and Navalny are fighting bloodily, each with the heart of a countryman. This is a huge contest for the survival of the country, which side are you on, or which hero are you willing to shout for?
The beginning of all this was the heroic death of Navalny, Russia's most prominent opposition leader. His death shook the whole of Russia like a thunderbolt, however, this was not an ordinary tragedy, but a contest for the fate of Russia. In order to understand the meaning of this competition, let's dig deeper into the events and discover the truth behind them.
Russia is facing a complex crisis at home and abroad, which has inadvertently become the trigger for the confrontation between the two heroes. The main contradiction has changed from the contradiction between various interest strata in the country to the contradiction between Russia and the Western world*** Putin claimed in an interview on state television: "Everything on the front line in Ukraine, for us, is our fate, this is a matter of survival." He firmly declared that what he was fighting for was Russia's survival and to save the land.
At this moment, I can't help but think of the letter I wrote to the Kuomintang division commander during the War of Resistance Against Japan: "Anyone who eats wool and practices the soil has no urgent task to save the country, and there is no work to resist Japan." "Today's Russians should also gather under the banner of national salvation, sacrifice the country without urgent tasks, take the survival of the country as the highest principle, and stand on the front line of national salvation.
However, at this existential juncture, Navalny seems to have chosen the path of opposition to the state. What people see is that he opposes for the sake of opposition, and the country is at a critical juncture of life and death, and he is still keen on "creating friction" and is willing to act as a pawn of Russia's enemies. He shouted empty words of democracy and freedom, but he was worthless in the face of national righteousness.
Russians know the cruel lessons of history, and they have learned the power of those who only shout the slogans of freedom and democracy. These slogans led to the collapse of the Soviet Union, bringing Russia to the brink of extinction, impoverishing its people and destroying decades of wealth. It is precisely because of those painful historical experiences that Russians have become not easily fooled and have voted for Putin again and again. They know that Navalny, who only shouts the slogans of freedom and democracy, will not do them any real good.
After Navalny's death, many Russian cities responded and launched commemorative activities, highly praising him and viewing him as a hero in the pursuit of democracy and freedom. However, the majority of Russians are unmoved, because they have been whipped by history, know right from wrong, and understand that the real benefits will bring them to those who can charge into battle when the nation is in peril, not those who shout empty slogans.
This battle of heroes has aroused widespread social discussion. Some netizens commented: "At this critical moment, what we need is a leader who dares to take responsibility and shoulder the responsibility for the survival of the country, not people who only know how to oppose and create friction." It is a clear and apt reflection of most people's skepticism about Navalny's actions. At the same time, Putin's firm stance on the international stage has also been praised by some as fighting for Russia's future.
In general, this huge game for the survival of the country is a contest between two heroes, Putin and Navalny. What Putin did was a matter of national righteousness, to save Russia, and to be a hero who dared to shoulder the responsibility for the survival of the country; Navalny's actions, on the other hand, chose the path of opposition to the state at a time of national crisis, and were hailed as heroes by some, but failed to make much waves in the hearts of most Russians. This contest seems to be a heroic showdown, but in fact it is an inevitable choice for the country to move forward, and the winner will lead Russia to a brighter future.
The contest between the two heroes has made people think deeply about the relationship between the country and the nation, and it has also triggered a wider range of thinking. The choice of the Russians is not only the choice of the leader, but also the trust in the future of the country. The lessons of history have taught them that leaders who shout loud slogans but fail to solve real problems will only plunge their countries deeper into their predicament.
At this critical juncture, the power that Putin represents to save the country and charge into battle has been recognized by the majority of people. They see that the survival of the country requires practical action, not empty slogans. This is also why Putin has repeatedly won the support of voters as the leader of Russia. The future of the country needs to be a hero, not a leader who is good at words but cannot deliver on his promises.
And Navalny's death has aroused the memory and praise of some people. In their eyes, he was a hero who fought valiantly for democracy and freedom. However, most Russians are more pragmatic and value the leader's ability to respond in times of crisis. Their choices show that when the country is at stake, it needs leaders who can lead the country through difficulties, not heroes who only know how to oppose it.
The story of the two heroes is like a magnificent picture, showing the wisdom and tenacity of the Russians. In this game of national survival, they chose to be heroes and take practical actions instead of empty slogans. This is not only a lesson from the past, but also an expectation for the future. Russia, under the guidance of heroes, will usher in a brighter tomorrow. It was a victorious battle for the survival of the nation and the beginning of a heroic saga.