The ranking of double first class universities was updated, Fudan retreated to eighth place, and H

Mondo Education Updated on 2024-02-01

The ranking of "double first-class" universities was updated, Fudan retreated to eighth place, and Huake fell out of the top ten

To meet the needs of economic and social development in the new era, the state has launched a "double first-class" university construction plan to improve the level of higher education. Compared with the 211 Project in the past, the "Double First-Class" plan pays more attention to precise development, and strives to focus limited resources on strengthening the top disciplines of colleges and universities to reach the world-class level. At present, China has more than 140 "double first-class" universities, of which except for some caring universities, other universities are worthy of attention.

The 2023 "Double First-Class" university rankings were released, and Zhejiang University fell to fifth place.

The "double first-class" construction plan has caused widespread controversy, but as we all know, choosing a top-ranked "double first-class" university is the most ideal choice when filling in the college entrance examination application. Therefore, it is crucial to have a comprehensive ranking of the "double first-class" universities so that everyone can better understand the situation.

Tsinghua University and Peking University remain firmly in the position of the top students in each province and do not need to be analyzed too much. Surprisingly, the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences came in third.

Although the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences has only been recruiting undergraduates for a short time, it has attracted many outstanding students by virtue of its strong faculty of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Its strength is second only to Tsinghua University and Peking University, and it is expected to compete with the five universities in East China in the future.

Zhejiang University lost to Shanghai Jiao Tong University and currently falls to fifth in the rankings. However, Zhejiang University has a strong momentum of development, and all disciplines have achieved balanced development, even excluding agricultural majors, its strength is still strong. If Shanghai Jiao Tong University's geographical advantage gradually disappears, Zhejiang University may surpass it in an all-round way.

Fudan University, another university in Shanghai, has also seen a significant regression, and is now ranked eighth. In the past three years, Fudan University's performance has been mediocre, and its research results are not obvious compared with Nanjing University and other schools, and it is difficult to highlight its advantages in addition to its international level.

Huazhong University of Science and Technology, which once made it into the top 10, is now ranked 15th, which is surprising. Schools around the country have publicized the results of the fifth round of subject evaluations, and there are rumors that Huazhong University of Science and Technology has poor evaluation results, and the overall research results are difficult to prominence, which may affect the ranking.

Engineering competition is fierce, and Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, ranked 11th, stands out, surpassing many established engineering universities, such as Xi'an Jiaotong University and Harbin Institute of Technology.

The state has abolished the distinction between first-class universities and first-class discipline universities, and they are collectively referred to as "double first-class" universities. As a result, some of the former 211 universities have surpassed some of the 985 universities, reflecting the principle that strength determines status.

For example, the University of Science and Technology Beijing, ranked 36th, has made remarkable progress, surpassing 985 universities such as Chongqing University and Ocean University of China. Many 211 universities, including Wuhan University of Technology and Nanjing University of Science and Technology, have the strength to challenge 985 universities.

Comprehensive universities have greater potential for future development because they are not affected by the rise and fall of the industry, and their rankings are more stable. Focusing on research results, comprehensive universities such as Soochow University, Shanghai University and Zhengzhou University have outstanding performance in medicine, humanities, science and engineering, and their scores and rankings are constantly improving.

In western developed countries, comprehensive universities are the mainstay, so in the case of the same major, priority is given to comprehensive universities that can cultivate personal qualities in an all-round way.

Finally, it is necessary to rationally refer to various rankings, taking into account professional and geographical factors, not just the strength of the school.

The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any of the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.

Related Pages