The reason behind Liu Bei's transfer to Liu Chan.
Liu Bei, one of the high-profile figures of the Three Kingdoms period, spent his life in pursuit of reviving the glory of the Han dynasty at the expense of himself, however, a series of decisions made after his death caused many controversies. One of them is to pass on his position to his son Liu Chan, who is "not angry", rather than several other sons.
Liu Bei had four sons, namely Liu Chan, Liu Feng, Liu Yong, and Liu Li. However, in fact, only Liu Chan was born to Liu Bei and Mrs. Gan, and the identities of the other three sons were questioned. Judging from her birth, Liu Chan's identity is the clearest.
The statement about Liu Chan's "indisputability" mainly stems from some wrong decisions when he was in charge of Shu. The first is the re-recruitment of the eunuch Huang Hao, which led to internal political chaos in Shu and was difficult to control. Secondly, he surrendered without a fight after Yinping was raided by the Shu army, showing his lack of decisiveness. Finally, there is the "happy and unmissable" incident praised by later generations, which shows his negative attitude in the predicament.
However, why did Liu Bei pass the throne to Liu Chan? There are several reasons why it's worth it. The first is the "primogeniture inheritance system" in feudal society, and Liu Bei, as a person who respects ethics and morality, is naturally inclined to pass on the throne to his own eldest son. Secondly, Liu Bei had high hopes for Liu Chan, because Liu Chan was his son in his later years, and he placed hope on this son. In addition, Liu Chan received the support of the heroes of the founding of the Shu State, which also provided a certain foundation for him to inherit the throne. Finally, Liu Chan himself also has certain talents and potential, and under the guidance of Zhuge Liang, he is expected to become a qualified general.
In general, Liu Bei's decision to pass on the throne to Liu Chan was influenced by a variety of factors, including the ties of the traditional ethical system, personal expectations for his son, and the interpretation of historical events by later generations. We should look at history with an objective attitude, understand the situation and the choices of people at that time.
Liu Bei's decision to pass on the throne to Liu Chan caused a lot of controversy. Liu Bei pursued the revival of the Han family all his life, but passed the throne to his son Liu Chan, who was known as "indisputable", what is the reason for this?
Liu Bei had four sons, of which Liu Chan was the only one born to Mrs. Gan. The identities of the other three sons are highly controversial, and Liu Chan's position is relatively stable.
However, Liu Chan is known as "not angry", mainly because of some mistakes during his time in power. The first is the reuse of the eunuch Huang Hao, which led to the chaos of the political situation in Shu. Secondly, after Yinping was raided by the Shu army, he surrendered without a fight, showing his lack of decisiveness. Finally, there is the "Never Happy" incident, which shows his negative attitude in a difficult situation.
So, why did Liu Bei pass the throne to Liu Chan? The first is the tradition of feudal society, that is, the "primogeniture system". As a person who attaches great importance to ethics and morality, Liu Bei is naturally inclined to pass on the throne to his own eldest son. Secondly, Liu Bei had high hopes for Liu Chan because he was a son in his later years. In addition, Liu Chan was supported by the founding heroes of the Shu State, which also provided the foundation for him to inherit the throne. Finally, Liu Chan herself also has certain talents and potential, and under the guidance of Zhuge Liang, she is expected to become a qualified general.
In general, Liu Bei's decision to pass on the throne to Liu Chan was influenced by a variety of factors, including the influence of the traditional feudal system, personal expectations for his son, and the interpretation of historical events by later generations. We should look at history with an objective attitude and understand the circumstances and choices of the people at that time.