February** Dynamic Incentive Plan Li Yizhou has become popular in recent days, although it is black and red. In fact, what many people object to is not selling courses, nor the pricing of this 199, but concocting anxiety without moderation and bottom line, the course has no dry goods (or even mistakes), the quality is not as good as free**, and they are even making profits from other people's open source projects.
Come out to sell classes, and make so much money, at least ask a professional team to review the manuscript, don't have low-level mistakes.
Yesterday, a friend in the group sent me a copy of Dr. Yizhou's 199 class, I listened to it with a research attitude, but I didn't expect that in the first class, the teacher told everyone clearly: token is very expensive, but we equip everyone with computing power, and buy a class to send a dialogue token. As soon as I heard it, this is also a good thing, right, after all, many people are stuck at the level of obtaining tools, and it is not cold to be a mirror station, and then I heard Mr. Yizhou's interpretation of the token:
OpenAI and ChatGPT-35 onwards, its billing standard is 0002 USD 1000 tokens. In the middle of English, a token is roughly equivalent to four characters. InThe middle word in Chinese is about 2 to 25 tokens。So 1000 tokens are about 750 words.This is a factual error. Because I remember very clearly, from GPT-3The API price reduction of 5 began, and the new tokenizer optimized Chinese, and Chinese characters have long been optimized to 1-15 tokens up:
Take another look at the course outline and duration....The more you get to the dry goods technology, the shorter the theoretical time, and the longer the roadside blowing water topic...I wasn't interested in continuing to watch.
Not to mention the ** of AI painting, a large number of people steal other people's models, and now there is a B station up master who has united to defend his rights:
Yesterday I saw a whole live, someone made an agent for Dr. Yizhou on the bean bag, but I went to test it, and it seems that there is not much knowledge base at the bottom.
However, this gives us an idea, ** can make a digital clone of your own content, put it on the Internet 7*24 to sell courses, I have made Erzhou GPT, come to me for cooperation :)
Finally, I want to say that this wave of AI technology and products focuses on the equality of all beings, there is no information gap as much as everyone imagined, and there is no need to buy ChatGPT members superstitiously, and many domestic products are enough to replace them.
You can click on any AI dialogue in China, follow Dr. Yizhou's course catalog to start a conversation with AI directly, ask him how to use AI to tutor children, and ask him how to write resumes and letters of introduction. If these AIs really are like oneTeacher Zhou blows so badly, so using AI to replace Teacher Yizhou is naturally not a problem. (Actually, the AI may really be better than him).
