Since ancient times, the situation has changed, and a literary and artistic turmoil has set off such a huge wave. Recently, "Yang Fan Talks About Art" blogger Yang Fan was so abused by the Internet that even breathing became a luxury because he exposed the plagiarism of Dong Dong (Dong Yuzhuo), the anchor who was with Hui. Through this dispute, I deeply feel the great changes of the times, and the Internet is surging like a tide, like an uncontrollable storm.
In this artistic turmoil, Yang Fan exposed Dong Dong's behavior in a humorous way, which made people feel respect in reading. However, men and women may have different perspectives on this event. Men may be more interested in the objectivity of facts and believe that sharing knowledge is not sinful, while women are more focused on emotional communication and are particularly sensitive to respect for originality. It makes me wonder if we can better understand and respect each other's creations in this digital age, rather than being antagonistic in controversy.
Yang Fan mentioned in the article that he was overwhelmed by cyberbullying and did not dare to express his dissatisfaction with plagiarism. This makes me deeply aware of the horror of online violence, which can sometimes become a kind of strangulation of dissent in the name of justice. In the face of such a situation, I cannot help but think about whether we need to be more rational in dealing with dissent in the process of pursuing justice, and protect the rights and interests of ourselves and others while expressing our opinions.
In this turmoil, Dong Dong said in the live broadcast that he may have used the works of some friends or teachers, but there was no malicious intent. This resonated with some netizens, who thought it was natural to achieve each other in the field of art. However, on the other hand, there are also those who point out whether the direct commercial use of someone else's content in the context of originality is proper plagiarism. This controversy has provoked strong repercussions on the Internet, as if a literary version of the "war of justice" is quietly brewing.
Just after the incident, Dong Dong left a message in the comment area of "Yang Fan Talks about Art" to apologize and express respect for the original. However, the comment was later deleted, calling into question its sincerity. Yang Fan responded: "He wrote and deleted it himself, and his apology was also very inappropriate." This makes the whole incident even more confusing, like an online one-man show.
As a member of the literary circle, I deeply feel that this controversy is magnificent, although it happened on the Internet, but it involves the efforts of every creator. Can we express our views while also being more rational about dissent, so that we can complement each other in a common temple of literature and art?
Perhaps, the silence of "Walking with Hui" is a manifestation of their silent thinking about how to solve the problem efficiently. We hope that they can rise to the challenge and reach a mutually decent solution with Yang Fan, so that this literary and artistic turmoil can subside as soon as possible.
In this era of the Internet, which is full of uncertainties, every controversy is constantly impacting the boundaries of our cognition. Behind this, can we be more rational in dealing with dissent, maintain our love for artistic creation, and let each creator be able to shine on their own stage, instead of being forced to bow their heads in controversy.
Finally, let us hope that this literary and artistic turmoil can finally be properly resolved, so that literary and artistic creation can usher in a better tomorrow in the Internet era.
The wind suddenly rose and the waves were born, and Yang Fan was unable to breathe through the fog. Fans were hit by the same storm, and it was difficult to defend their rights.
Hui did not connect with the clan, and actively solved things and sought harmony. Contact a call to understand, a decent end is a good policy.
There is a lot of plagiarism, and there are many funny and original names. The content of the explanation is like a shadow, and the commercial communication is incoherent.
Netizens argue that knowledge is copied, and history is objectively not a right reason. The narration method is logical, and subjective plagiarism is bitter.
Dong Sheng was not heard in the live broadcast, and the little friend teacher used the work. Mutual achievement is non-offensive, and the field of art is praised.
Leave a message to apologize for the short words, respect the original air floating. The comments deleted the fan dispute, and the apology was not really heart-wrenching.
There was no response from Huifang, and the account deleted the fragment. Netizens are invited to comment, where to ask after the turmoil.