The Chinese lack not only wisdom and, more precisely, the ability to be bad guys. In fact, being a bad guy doesn't require wisdom or ability, just go with your nature.
However, when I say bad guys, I mean decent bad guys, elegant bad guys, upright bad guys, really capable, charismatic, and high-level bad guys. There are not many bad people like this in China.
On the contrary, they seem to be mostly flies and dogs, obscene and trivial, eager for quick success, and short-sighted. It's very vulgar, it's vulgar, it's rustic, it's a kind of unproductive, it's not a big deal.
In other words, although there are many bad guys, there are not many decent bad guys, and there are not many bad guys who can get their hands on them. Therefore, I call them incapable of being bad people without the wisdom to be bad people.
Since you can't be a bad person, why not choose to be a good person? In the same way, they don't have the wisdom to be good people.
It's hard to be a bad person, and it's not easy to be a good person. It's not that good people are hard to do, it's that they lack the wisdom to be good people. To be a good person, you also need insight and cognitive ability. Morality and wisdom are inseparable, and kindness is not only a quality, but also a wisdom.
Aren't the Chinese smart? It has a long history and many people. They are very smart, but their cleverness is only a small cleverness, which is limited to mutual harm and competing interests, and they lack real cleverness and wisdom. People often lament that there are not many good people, and the root of the problem is here.
Doesn't Chinese culture and tradition place a special emphasis on benevolence, righteousness, and morality? Yes, they put a lot of emphasis on morality, but the point of the matter is that although the Chinese emphasize morality, they do not know the path to achieve morality. In this case, instead of being realized, morality has become a tool for harm and ignorance, and even a source of sin. Therefore, morality and ** are inseparable, ** is morality, and morality is**.
If a society lacks the knowledge of truth and strongly pursues morality, it can only create two consequences, one is rich in hypocrites, and the other is rich in *** The former is represented by Confucian society, and the latter is represented by a certain religious society. The reason why Confucian society has become a hypocritical rather than a terrorist society is that people's moral pursuit is essentially hypocritical, mainly to educate others to be moral, and second, fortunately, people are timid and lack the spirit of martyrs, so hypocrites are produced.
The second reason why it is difficult to have good people in Chinese society is that Chinese culture, whether it is Confucianism or Buddhism, makes people self-righteous. It's terrible that everybody thinks they're good, and they think they're good. The argument that human nature is good and that everyone can become a Buddha has laid the theoretical foundation for the culture of self-righteousness. In a self-righteous society, in a self-righteous society that lacks self-reflection, there can be no good people fundamentally.
The final question is, if you can't be a bad person, you can't be a good person, so who are they? Aren't people who are not good or bad? Definitely. Not a good person, not a bad person, there is only one way out left, and he has become a stupid person.
Being stupid doesn't mean bad, and being stupid often portends prosperity and fame. If you don't believe it, look at those big Vs, they probably can't run this law, the more stupid the fans, and the more stupid the reputation.
#February** Dynamic Incentive Program#