The capsizing case of a mainland fishing boat has caused an uproar in Taiwan, and the Taiwan authorities' refusal to admit their mistake has attracted people's attention. At the same time, Ke Wenzhe made two sentences at a critical moment, which caused deep thought. Through the description of this incident and Ke Wenzhe's statement, we can get a glimpse of the subtle changes in the situation in the Taiwan Strait and the different attitudes and ways of handling such incidents on both sides.
Taiwan's "Coast Guard" chased a Fujian fishing boat in the waters around Kinmen Island, causing the fishing boat to capsize and two people to die. The Taiwan authorities did not admit their mistake, but stressed the need to "perform their duties according to law" in an attempt to shift the responsibility to the mainland fishing boats. This attitude makes people question whether its intention is to provoke the mainland and aggravate cross-strait tension.
In contrast to the negative attitude of the Taiwan authorities, China's Taiwan Affairs Office responded to the incident as soon as possible, demanding that the Taiwan side find out the truth and respect the traditional operations of fishermen on both sides of the strait. The mainland side has shown that it attaches great importance to it and hopes that the Taiwan side will avoid the recurrence of similar incidents. The reactions of the two sides are in stark contrast, which shows that the mainland attaches great importance to this matter and expects a positive response from the Taiwan side.
Taiwan "** stated that it regretted the incident, but did not really assume the responsibility of the investigation. The Taiwan authorities have not realized their mistake and have instead tried to blame the mainland, a move that could lead to even greater disputes. The authorities' reluctance to face up to their mistakes may lead to further tensions and be detrimental to the situation in the Taiwan Strait.
Ke Wenzhe said at the event that it is the responsibility to protect the rights and interests of fishermen, but it should be resolved peacefully and avoided. He called on the Taiwan authorities to negotiate with the mainland on the issue of fishing rights to avoid the recurrence of similar incidents. Ke Wenzhe's viewpoint embodies a rational and peaceful way of resolving conflicts, which is worth learning from.
Ke Wenzhe's statement aims to maintain stability, resolve differences through consultation, and avoid escalation. His suggestion pointed out a new direction for the development of the company, and also provided ideas and references for dealing with similar incidents.
Ke Wenzhe's remarks reflect a calm and rational attitude, and he does not lightly provoke or accuse. He advocated seeking a win-win solution, avoiding the escalation of conflicts, and contributing to maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. This rational attitude deserves to be affirmed and advocated.
After the incident, the mainland and Taiwan have completely different attitudes toward the incident. The mainland side insisted on investigating the truth and respecting the traditional operations of fishermen, and called on Taiwan to take measures to avoid recurrence. However, the Taiwan authorities refuse to admit their mistakes and blame others, showing their irresponsible and provocative side. In this context, Ke Wenzhe's statement is particularly precious, he advocates a peaceful solution, avoids intensifying contradictions, and has made constructive efforts to maintain stability. It is this rational and calm way of handling it that can effectively avoid the recurrence of similar incidents and contribute to the promotion of peaceful development. It is hoped that all parties will handle their differences with an open mind and a rational attitude and jointly safeguard peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.