Recently, the central media spoke out on the K511 high-speed rail dining car passengers accusing the crew of eating in the dining car and the Guangzhou Railway Group's rapid handling of the crew: Guangzhou Railway's seemingly "not protecting the short" apology just makes the public worry about whether it will promote the atmosphere of "mobile phone judges", and it is not appropriate to mislead "whoever makes a big deal will benefit". This statement has aroused widespread social concern. This incident not only exposed the public's neglect of the rights and interests of service personnel, but also highlighted the profound impact of the phenomenon of "mobile phone judges" on society since the era.
"Mobile phone judge" refers to netizens who rashly accuse and criticize the behavior of others through social platforms such as mobile phones. Without knowing the complete facts, they only judge the incident based on one-sided words, and even make personal attacks on the parties, and there is a guidance of "whoever shoots the ** is justified". This phenomenon has become more and more serious in the era of **, which has had a great negative impact on society. Such as:
A user posted a section on a bus, accusing a young woman of not giving up her seat to an old man. ** Went viral, triggering fierce criticism of the woman and doxing by netizens. However, it was later confirmed that the woman was unwell and could not get up to give up her seat. This case reflects the "mobile phone judge" who makes unfair accusations against others based on only fragments of information without knowing the truth.
A netizen filmed a passenger eating snacks on the subway and uploaded it to social ** accusing him of being uncivilized. However, some netizens later pointed out that the snacks eaten by the passenger were low-sugar and tasteless healthy foods, and they were not explicitly prohibited on the subway. This case shows that the "mobile phone judge" is prone to make one-sided evaluations of other people's behaviors in the absence of comprehensive information.
These cases all show that in the self-era, social platforms such as mobile phones have become amplifiers. On the one hand, they make information more rapid and widespread; On the other hand, it has also exacerbated the occurrence of the phenomenon of "mobile phone judges". Therefore, we need to be wary of the double-edged sword effect of the ** era, not only to make full use of its communication advantages, but also to avoid being misled by one-sided information and becoming a "mobile phone judge".