In February, the ** dynamic incentive plan exceeded 1.4 billion, and the box office of the movie "Article 20" directed by Zhang Yimou continued to rise, and today it even won the first place in the single-day box office list, exceeding 61 million. It can be seen that this movie is very hot.
However, the audience of this movie should not be ordinary people, but judges at all levels across the country, because it is these judges who use "Article 20" to control the fate of others.
What is the significance of us ordinary people watching Article 20? At most, even if you learn a little about the law of justifiable defense, what can you do? If you are unfortunate enough to get into trouble, you will not be able to grasp the law, and you will have to listen to the judge's decision.
In my opinion, Zhang Yimou's filming of "Article 20" is to be filmed for judges, so that judges can think deeply about how they should understand and use Article 20. Why do you want to shoot them? Of course, this is because some judges do not understand it reasonably.
At least before the Longge anti-homicide case in Kunshan, Jiangsu, where the judge did not understand justifiable defense in cases involving justifiable defense, such as the Wang Lang counter-homicide case similar to the Kunshan Longge anti-homicide case.
The Kunshan Longge anti-homicide case was in 2018, and the Wang Lang anti-homicide case was in 2017. The specific facts of this case are too long, I won't talk about it here, if you want to know, you can search on the Internet, in short, it was also provoked and actively harmed by the other party.
However, Wang Lang was not found to be justified in the first instance and was sentenced to 9 years, and it was because of the compensation of 360,000 yuan. In the second instance, although it was found to be justified defense, the word "excessive" was added, and he was sentenced to 5 years.
I have seen this case in detail, and I feel that Wang Lang was sentenced to five years very unjustly, and his family also paid 360,000 yuan in compensation. Wang Lang asked questions in court, but none of the judges gave answers. Lawyer Xu Xin asked: Can you only run?
Of course, there are many similar cases, otherwise they would not have caused a huge social reaction. In the relevant cases, the judges have put forward harsh requirements for the victim's defense, completely ignoring the normal reaction of a normal person.
That's why I said that "Article 20" is for judges, and the Supreme People's Court should assign the first task, requiring judges in the national court system to go to the cinema to take a look, study it carefully, and write a review of no less than 3,000 words each.
Article 20 has long been controversial, allowing the wicked to take refuge and innocent victims to be imprisoned or pay huge compensation. This kind of thing that is obviously contrary to common sense has been said by some judges to be a legal provision, so that good people dare not fight back against bad people.
The Jiangsu Provincial Procuratorate once released an article entitled "100 Criminal Cases Tell You That Legitimate Defense Has to Run", which caused an uproar, but it also had to admit itIn the face of illegal infringement, 36 strategies are the best！But if so, what is the point of Article 20?
That's why I say that Article 20 was made into a movie, although it is because cases involving legitimate defense have aroused social discussion and become a social issue, but I can't help but say that it is ironic. Who made Article 20 a social issue? Who should blush and be ashamed after watching this movie?